From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ceph/super: add mount options "snapdir{mode,uid,gid}"
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:10:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db650fa8-8b64-5275-7390-f6b48bfd3a37@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKPOu+_Jk0EHRDjqiNuFv8wL0kLXLLRZpx7AgWDPOWHzJn22xg@mail.gmail.com>
On 25/10/2022 15:22, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 3:36 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Currently cephx permission has already supported the 's' permission,
>> which means you can do the snapshot create/remove. And for a privileged
>> or specific mounts you can give them the 's' permission and then only
>> they can do the snapshot create/remove. And all the others won't.
> But that's a client permission, not a user permission.
>
> I repeat: the problem is that snapshots should only be
> accessible/discoverable/creatable by certain users (UIDs/GIDs) on the
> client machine, independent of their permission on the parent
> directory.
Hi Max,
Yeah, the cephx permission could cover this totally and there is no need
to worry about the user id mapping issue.
You can allow the mount with specific client ids, "client.privileged"
for example, could create/remove the snapshots:
[client.privileged]
key = AQA19uZUqIwkHxAAFuUwvq0eJD4S173oFRxe0g==
caps mds = "allow rws /"
caps mon = "allow *"
caps osd = "allow *"
[client.global]
key = xE21RuZTqIuiHxFFAuEwv4TjJD3R176BFOi4Fj==
caps mds = "allow rw /"
caps mon = "allow *"
caps osd = "allow *"
Then specify the client ids when mounting:
$ sudo ./bin/mount.ceph privileged@.a=/ /mnt/privileged/mountpoint
$ sudo ./bin/mount.ceph global@.a=/ /mnt/global/mountpoint
Just to make sure only certain users, who have permission to
create/remove snapshots, could access to the "/mnt/privileged/" directory.
I didn't read the openshift code, but when I was debugging the bugs and
from the logs I saw it acting similarly to this.
> My patch decouples parent directory permissions from snapdir
> permissions, and it's a simple and elegant solution to my problem.
Yeah, I'm aware of the differences between these two approaches exactly.
This should be a common feature not only in kernel client. We also need
to implement this in cephfs user space client. If the above cephx
permission approach could work very well everywhere, I am afraid this
couldn't go to ceph in user space.
>> And then use the container or something else to make the specific users
>> could access to them.
> Sorry, I don't get it at all. What is "the container or something" and
> how does it enable me to prevent specific users from accessing
> snapdirs in their home directories?
>
Please see my above example. If that still won't work well, please send
one mail in ceph-user to discuss this further, probably we can get more
feedbacks from there.
Thanks!
- Xiubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 12:08 [PATCH] fs/ceph/super: add mount options "snapdir{mode,uid,gid}" Max Kellermann
2022-10-09 6:23 ` Xiubo Li
2022-10-09 6:49 ` Max Kellermann
[not found] ` <75e7f676-8c85-af0a-97b2-43664f60c811@redhat.com>
2022-10-09 10:27 ` Max Kellermann
2022-10-09 10:28 ` Max Kellermann
2022-10-10 2:02 ` Xiubo Li
2022-10-11 7:19 ` Max Kellermann
2022-10-11 10:45 ` Jeff Layton
2022-10-20 1:29 ` Xiubo Li
2022-10-20 10:13 ` Jeff Layton
2022-10-21 0:47 ` Xiubo Li
2022-10-25 1:35 ` Xiubo Li
2022-10-25 7:22 ` Max Kellermann
2022-10-25 9:10 ` Xiubo Li [this message]
2022-10-25 9:57 ` Max Kellermann
2022-10-11 9:28 ` Luís Henriques
2022-10-11 9:56 ` Max Kellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db650fa8-8b64-5275-7390-f6b48bfd3a37@redhat.com \
--to=xiubli@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).