* [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb Ritesh Harjani
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
Hello,
Please find the v2 of this patch series which addresses the review comments from
Jan on PATCH-2 & PATCH-7. No changes other than that.
Summary
========
This patch series aimes at fixing some of the issues identified in fast_commit
with flex_bg. This also adds some stricter checking of blocks to be freed in
ext4_mb_clear_bb(), ext4_group_add_blocks() & ext4_mb_mark_bb()
Testing
=========
I have run xfstests with -g log,metadata,auto group with 4k & 4k_fc
configs. I have not found any regression due to these patches alone.
But I have found few issues like generic/047 occasionally failing even w/o this
patch series. I do have some fixes for those too in my tree. I will send those
fixes later after figuring out few more things around couple other failures.
References
===========
[v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com/
[RFC]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a9770b46522c03989bdd96f63f7d0bfb2cf499ab.1643642105.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com/
Ritesh Harjani (9):
ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb
ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit
ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb()
ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded
ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits
ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()
ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks
ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 26 +--
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 5 +-
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 4 +-
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 +-
5 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit Ritesh Harjani
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
ext4_mb_mark_bb() currently wrongly calculates cluster len (clen) and
flex_group->free_clusters. This patch fixes that.
Identified based on code review of ext4_mb_mark_bb() function.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 67ac95c4cd9b..b8ffbc0ebe14 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3899,10 +3899,11 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
ext4_group_t group;
ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
- int i, clen, err;
+ int i, err;
int already;
+ unsigned int clen, clen_changed;
- clen = EXT4_B2C(sbi, len);
+ clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, len);
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, &blkoff);
bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
@@ -3923,6 +3924,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state)
already++;
+ clen_changed = clen - already;
if (state)
ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
else
@@ -3935,9 +3937,9 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
group, gdp));
}
if (state)
- clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen + already;
+ clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen_changed;
else
- clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen - already;
+ clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen_changed;
ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, clen);
ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
@@ -3947,10 +3949,13 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group);
+ struct flex_groups *fg = sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi,
+ s_flex_groups, flex_group);
- atomic64_sub(len,
- &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups,
- flex_group)->free_clusters);
+ if (state)
+ atomic64_sub(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+ else
+ atomic64_add(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
}
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, bitmap_bh);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb() Ritesh Harjani
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
In case of flex_bg feature (which is by default enabled), extents for
any given inode might span across blocks from two different block group.
ext4_mb_mark_bb() only reads the buffer_head of block bitmap once for the
starting block group, but it fails to read it again when the extent length
boundary overflows to another block group. Then in this below loop it
accesses memory beyond the block group bitmap buffer_head and results
into a data abort.
for (i = 0; i < clen; i++)
if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state)
already++;
This patch adds this functionality for checking block group boundary in
ext4_mb_mark_bb() and update the buffer_head(bitmap_bh) for every different
block group.
w/o this patch, I was easily able to hit a data access abort using Power platform.
<...>
[ 74.327662] EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:1141: group 11, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 21248 vs 23294 free clusters
[ 74.533214] EXT4-fs (loop3): shut down requested (2)
[ 74.536705] Aborting journal on device loop3-8.
[ 74.702705] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000005e980000
[ 74.703727] Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000007bffb8
cpu 0xd: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000000015db7060]
pc: c0000000007bffb8: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0x198/0x5a0
lr: c0000000007bfeec: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0xcc/0x5a0
sp: c000000015db7300
msr: 800000000280b033
dar: c00000005e980000
dsisr: 40000000
current = 0xc000000027af6880
paca = 0xc00000003ffd5200 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01
pid = 5167, comm = mount
<...>
enter ? for help
[c000000015db7380] c000000000782708 ext4_ext_clear_bb+0x378/0x410
[c000000015db7400] c000000000813f14 ext4_fc_replay+0x1794/0x2000
[c000000015db7580] c000000000833f7c do_one_pass+0xe9c/0x12a0
[c000000015db7710] c000000000834504 jbd2_journal_recover+0x184/0x2d0
[c000000015db77c0] c000000000841398 jbd2_journal_load+0x188/0x4a0
[c000000015db7880] c000000000804de8 ext4_fill_super+0x2638/0x3e10
[c000000015db7a40] c0000000005f8404 get_tree_bdev+0x2b4/0x350
[c000000015db7ae0] c0000000007ef058 ext4_get_tree+0x28/0x40
[c000000015db7b00] c0000000005f6344 vfs_get_tree+0x44/0x100
[c000000015db7b70] c00000000063c408 path_mount+0xdd8/0xe70
[c000000015db7c40] c00000000063c8f0 sys_mount+0x450/0x550
[c000000015db7d50] c000000000035770 system_call_exception+0x4a0/0x4e0
[c000000015db7e10] c00000000000c74c system_call_common+0xec/0x250
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index b8ffbc0ebe14..816322eddd2b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3901,72 +3901,93 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
int i, err;
int already;
- unsigned int clen, clen_changed;
+ unsigned int clen, clen_changed, thisgrp_len;
- clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, len);
-
- ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, &blkoff);
- bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
- if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
- bitmap_bh = NULL;
- goto out_err;
- }
-
- err = -EIO;
- gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, &gdp_bh);
- if (!gdp)
- goto out_err;
+ while (len > 0) {
+ ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, &blkoff);
- ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
- already = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < clen; i++)
- if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state)
- already++;
-
- clen_changed = clen - already;
- if (state)
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
- else
- mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
- if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
- (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
- gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
- ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp,
- ext4_free_clusters_after_init(sb,
- group, gdp));
- }
- if (state)
- clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen_changed;
- else
- clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen_changed;
+ /*
+ * Check to see if we are freeing blocks across a group
+ * boundary.
+ * In case of flex_bg, this can happen that (block, len) may
+ * span across more than one group. In that case we need to
+ * get the corresponding group metadata to work with.
+ * For this we have goto again loop.
+ */
+ thisgrp_len = min_t(unsigned int, (unsigned int)len,
+ EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - EXT4_C2B(sbi, blkoff));
+ clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, thisgrp_len);
- ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, clen);
- ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
- ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, group, gdp);
+ bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
+ if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
+ bitmap_bh = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
- ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
+ err = -EIO;
+ gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, &gdp_bh);
+ if (!gdp)
+ break;
- if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
- ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group);
- struct flex_groups *fg = sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi,
- s_flex_groups, flex_group);
+ ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
+ already = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < clen; i++)
+ if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) ==
+ !state)
+ already++;
+ clen_changed = clen - already;
if (state)
- atomic64_sub(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+ ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
else
- atomic64_add(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+ mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
+ if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
+ (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
+ gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
+ ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp,
+ ext4_free_clusters_after_init(sb, group, gdp));
+ }
+ if (state)
+ clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen_changed;
+ else
+ clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen_changed;
+
+ ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, clen);
+ ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
+ ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, group, gdp);
+
+ ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
+
+ if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
+ ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group);
+ struct flex_groups *fg = sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi,
+ s_flex_groups, flex_group);
+
+ if (state)
+ atomic64_sub(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+ else
+ atomic64_add(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+
+ }
+
+ err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, bitmap_bh);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ sync_dirty_buffer(bitmap_bh);
+ err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, gdp_bh);
+ sync_dirty_buffer(gdp_bh);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+
+ block += thisgrp_len;
+ len -= thisgrp_len;
+ brelse(bitmap_bh);
+ BUG_ON(len < 0);
}
- err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, bitmap_bh);
if (err)
- goto out_err;
- sync_dirty_buffer(bitmap_bh);
- err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, gdp_bh);
- sync_dirty_buffer(gdp_bh);
-
-out_err:
- brelse(bitmap_bh);
+ brelse(bitmap_bh);
}
/*
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb()
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded Ritesh Harjani
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
ext4_free_blocks() function became too long and confusing, this patch
just pulls out the ext4_mb_clear_bb() function logic from it
which clears the block bitmap and frees it.
No functionality change in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 816322eddd2b..7b80c5dd9f40 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5872,7 +5872,8 @@ static void ext4_free_blocks_simple(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t block,
}
/**
- * ext4_free_blocks() -- Free given blocks and update quota
+ * ext4_mb_clear_bb() -- helper function for freeing blocks.
+ * Used by ext4_free_blocks()
* @handle: handle for this transaction
* @inode: inode
* @bh: optional buffer of the block to be freed
@@ -5880,9 +5881,9 @@ static void ext4_free_blocks_simple(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t block,
* @count: number of blocks to be freed
* @flags: flags used by ext4_free_blocks
*/
-void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
- struct buffer_head *bh, ext4_fsblk_t block,
- unsigned long count, int flags)
+static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
+ ext4_fsblk_t block, unsigned long count,
+ int flags)
{
struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
@@ -5899,80 +5900,6 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
- if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) {
- ext4_free_blocks_simple(inode, block, count);
- return;
- }
-
- might_sleep();
- if (bh) {
- if (block)
- BUG_ON(block != bh->b_blocknr);
- else
- block = bh->b_blocknr;
- }
-
- if (!(flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED) &&
- !ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) {
- ext4_error(sb, "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
- "block = %llu, count = %lu", block, count);
- goto error_return;
- }
-
- ext4_debug("freeing block %llu\n", block);
- trace_ext4_free_blocks(inode, block, count, flags);
-
- if (bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
- BUG_ON(count > 1);
-
- ext4_forget(handle, flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA,
- inode, bh, block);
- }
-
- /*
- * If the extent to be freed does not begin on a cluster
- * boundary, we need to deal with partial clusters at the
- * beginning and end of the extent. Normally we will free
- * blocks at the beginning or the end unless we are explicitly
- * requested to avoid doing so.
- */
- overflow = EXT4_PBLK_COFF(sbi, block);
- if (overflow) {
- if (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NOFREE_FIRST_CLUSTER) {
- overflow = sbi->s_cluster_ratio - overflow;
- block += overflow;
- if (count > overflow)
- count -= overflow;
- else
- return;
- } else {
- block -= overflow;
- count += overflow;
- }
- }
- overflow = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, count);
- if (overflow) {
- if (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NOFREE_LAST_CLUSTER) {
- if (count > overflow)
- count -= overflow;
- else
- return;
- } else
- count += sbi->s_cluster_ratio - overflow;
- }
-
- if (!bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
- int i;
- int is_metadata = flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA;
-
- for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- cond_resched();
- if (is_metadata)
- bh = sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb, block + i);
- ext4_forget(handle, is_metadata, inode, bh, block + i);
- }
- }
-
do_more:
overflow = 0;
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &block_group, &bit);
@@ -6140,6 +6067,103 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return;
}
+/**
+ * ext4_free_blocks() -- Free given blocks and update quota
+ * @handle: handle for this transaction
+ * @inode: inode
+ * @bh: optional buffer of the block to be freed
+ * @block: starting physical block to be freed
+ * @count: number of blocks to be freed
+ * @flags: flags used by ext4_free_blocks
+ */
+void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
+ struct buffer_head *bh, ext4_fsblk_t block,
+ unsigned long count, int flags)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+ unsigned int overflow;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
+
+ sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+
+ if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) {
+ ext4_free_blocks_simple(inode, block, count);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ might_sleep();
+ if (bh) {
+ if (block)
+ BUG_ON(block != bh->b_blocknr);
+ else
+ block = bh->b_blocknr;
+ }
+
+ if (!(flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED) &&
+ !ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
+ "block = %llu, count = %lu", block, count);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ext4_debug("freeing block %llu\n", block);
+ trace_ext4_free_blocks(inode, block, count, flags);
+
+ if (bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
+ BUG_ON(count > 1);
+
+ ext4_forget(handle, flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA,
+ inode, bh, block);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the extent to be freed does not begin on a cluster
+ * boundary, we need to deal with partial clusters at the
+ * beginning and end of the extent. Normally we will free
+ * blocks at the beginning or the end unless we are explicitly
+ * requested to avoid doing so.
+ */
+ overflow = EXT4_PBLK_COFF(sbi, block);
+ if (overflow) {
+ if (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NOFREE_FIRST_CLUSTER) {
+ overflow = sbi->s_cluster_ratio - overflow;
+ block += overflow;
+ if (count > overflow)
+ count -= overflow;
+ else
+ return;
+ } else {
+ block -= overflow;
+ count += overflow;
+ }
+ }
+ overflow = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, count);
+ if (overflow) {
+ if (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NOFREE_LAST_CLUSTER) {
+ if (count > overflow)
+ count -= overflow;
+ else
+ return;
+ } else
+ count += sbi->s_cluster_ratio - overflow;
+ }
+
+ if (!bh && (flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET)) {
+ int i;
+ int is_metadata = flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ cond_resched();
+ if (is_metadata)
+ bh = sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb, block + i);
+ ext4_forget(handle, is_metadata, inode, bh, block + i);
+ }
+ }
+
+ ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle, inode, block, count, flags);
+ return;
+}
+
/**
* ext4_group_add_blocks() -- Add given blocks to an existing group
* @handle: handle to this transaction
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb() Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits Ritesh Harjani
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
Instead of open coding it, use in_range() function instead.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index 7964ee34e322..3c5baca38767 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -1875,8 +1875,8 @@ bool ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t blk)
if (state->fc_regions[i].ino == 0 ||
state->fc_regions[i].len == 0)
continue;
- if (blk >= state->fc_regions[i].pblk &&
- blk < state->fc_regions[i].pblk + state->fc_regions[i].len)
+ if (in_range(blk, state->fc_regions[i].pblk,
+ state->fc_regions[i].len))
return true;
}
return false;
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() Ritesh Harjani
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
ext4_set_bits() should actually be mb_set_bits() for uniform API naming
convention.
This is via below cmd -
grep -nr "ext4_set_bits" fs/ext4/ | cut -d ":" -f 1 | xargs sed -i 's/ext4_set_bits/mb_set_bits/g'
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 +++++++-------
fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index bcd3b9bf8069..97c85ae185a9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
#define ext4_find_next_zero_bit find_next_zero_bit_le
#define ext4_find_next_bit find_next_bit_le
-extern void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len);
+extern void mb_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len);
/*
* Maximal mount counts between two filesystem checks
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 7b80c5dd9f40..c2a6f924b456 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ static int mb_test_and_clear_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
return zero_bit;
}
-void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
+void mb_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
{
__u32 *addr;
@@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
mb_set_largest_free_order(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info);
mb_update_avg_fragment_size(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info);
- ext4_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0);
+ mb_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0);
mb_check_buddy(e4b);
return ret;
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
* We leak some of the blocks here.
*/
ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
@@ -3844,7 +3844,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
}
}
#endif
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
(gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
@@ -3939,7 +3939,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
clen_changed = clen - already;
if (state)
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
else
mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
while (n) {
entry = rb_entry(n, struct ext4_free_data, efd_node);
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap, entry->efd_start_cluster, entry->efd_count);
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap, entry->efd_start_cluster, entry->efd_count);
n = rb_next(n);
}
return;
@@ -4500,7 +4500,7 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_from_pa(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
if (unlikely(len == 0))
continue;
BUG_ON(groupnr != group);
- ext4_set_bits(bitmap, start, len);
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap, start, len);
preallocated += len;
}
mb_debug(sb, "preallocated %d for group %u\n", preallocated, group);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index ee8f02f406cb..f507f34be602 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int set_flexbg_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, handle_t *handle,
}
ext4_debug("mark block bitmap %#04llx (+%llu/%u)\n",
first_cluster, first_cluster - start, count2);
- ext4_set_bits(bh->b_data, first_cluster - start, count2);
+ mb_set_bits(bh->b_data, first_cluster - start, count2);
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bh);
brelse(bh);
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int setup_new_flex_group_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
if (overhead != 0) {
ext4_debug("mark backup superblock %#04llx (+0)\n",
start);
- ext4_set_bits(bh->b_data, 0,
+ mb_set_bits(bh->b_data, 0,
EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, overhead));
}
ext4_mark_bitmap_end(EXT4_B2C(sbi, group_data[i].blocks_count),
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid() Ritesh Harjani
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
We don't need the return value of mb_test_and_clear_bits() in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
So simply use mb_clear_bits() instead.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index c2a6f924b456..bb3cfcd545ce 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
if (state)
mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
else
- mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
+ mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
(gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks Ritesh Harjani
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
This API will be needed at places where we don't have an inode
for e.g. while freeing blocks in ext4_group_add_blocks()
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 4666b55b736e..5504f72bbbbe 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -292,15 +292,10 @@ void ext4_release_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
call_rcu(&system_blks->rcu, ext4_destroy_system_zone);
}
-/*
- * Returns 1 if the passed-in block region (start_blk,
- * start_blk+count) is valid; 0 if some part of the block region
- * overlaps with some other filesystem metadata blocks.
- */
-int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
- unsigned int count)
+int ext4_sb_block_valid(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode,
+ ext4_fsblk_t start_blk, unsigned int count)
{
- struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
struct ext4_system_zone *entry;
struct rb_node *n;
@@ -329,7 +324,9 @@ int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
n = n->rb_right;
else {
- ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
+ ret = 0;
+ if (inode)
+ ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
break;
}
}
@@ -338,6 +335,17 @@ int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Returns 1 if the passed-in block region (start_blk,
+ * start_blk+count) is valid; 0 if some part of the block region
+ * overlaps with some other filesystem metadata blocks.
+ */
+int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
+ unsigned int count)
+{
+ return ext4_sb_block_valid(inode->i_sb, inode, start_blk, count);
+}
+
int ext4_check_blockref(const char *function, unsigned int line,
struct inode *inode, __le32 *p, unsigned int max)
{
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 97c85ae185a9..0d4f284c0514 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -3707,6 +3707,9 @@ extern int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int count);
extern int ext4_check_blockref(const char *, unsigned int,
struct inode *, __le32 *, unsigned int);
+extern int ext4_sb_block_valid(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode,
+ ext4_fsblk_t start_blk, unsigned int count);
+
/* extents.c */
struct ext4_ext_path;
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid() Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-03 0:41 ` [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Theodore Ts'o
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
Currently ext4_mb_clear_bb() & ext4_group_add_blocks() only checks
whether the given block ranges (which is to be freed) belongs to any FS
metadata blocks or not, of the block's respective block group.
But to detect any FS error early, it is better to add more strict
checkings in those functions which checks whether the given blocks
belongs to any critical FS metadata or not within system-zone.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 16 +++-------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index bb3cfcd545ce..0a95bdb1e07b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5930,13 +5930,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
goto error_return;
}
- if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) ||
- in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) ||
- in_range(block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
- sbi->s_itb_per_group) ||
- in_range(block + count - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
- sbi->s_itb_per_group)) {
-
+ if (!ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Freeing blocks in system zone - "
"Block = %llu, count = %lu", block, count);
/* err = 0. ext4_std_error should be a no op */
@@ -6007,7 +6001,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
NULL);
if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "discard request in"
- " group:%d block:%d count:%lu failed"
+ " group:%u block:%d count:%lu failed"
" with %d", block_group, bit, count,
err);
} else
@@ -6220,11 +6214,7 @@ int ext4_group_add_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb,
goto error_return;
}
- if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc), block, count) ||
- in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc), block, count) ||
- in_range(block, ext4_inode_table(sb, desc), sbi->s_itb_per_group) ||
- in_range(block + count - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, desc),
- sbi->s_itb_per_group)) {
+ if (!ext4_sb_block_valid(sb, NULL, block, count)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Adding blocks in system zones - "
"Block = %llu, count = %lu",
block, count);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-02-16 7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-03 0:41 ` [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Theodore Ts'o
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2022-02-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: Jan Kara, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, Harshad Shirwadkar,
linux-fsdevel, Ritesh Harjani
This patch adds an extra checks in ext4_mb_mark_bb() function
to make sure we mark & report error if we were to mark/clear any
of the critical FS metadata specific bitmaps (&bail out) to prevent
from any accidental corruption.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 0a95bdb1e07b..5f0bc6d0aabe 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3918,6 +3918,14 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - EXT4_C2B(sbi, blkoff));
clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, thisgrp_len);
+ if (!ext4_sb_block_valid(sb, NULL, block, thisgrp_len)) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Marking blocks in system zone - "
+ "Block = %llu, len = %u",
+ block, thisgrp_len);
+ bitmap_bh = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption Ritesh Harjani
@ 2022-03-03 0:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2022-03-03 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani, linux-ext4
Cc: Theodore Ts'o, linux-fsdevel, Andreas Dilger, Jan Kara,
Harshad Shirwadkar
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:32:42 +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Please find the v2 of this patch series which addresses the review comments from
> Jan on PATCH-2 & PATCH-7. No changes other than that.
>
> Summary
> ========
> This patch series aimes at fixing some of the issues identified in fast_commit
> with flex_bg. This also adds some stricter checking of blocks to be freed in
> ext4_mb_clear_bb(), ext4_group_add_blocks() & ext4_mb_mark_bb()
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb
commit: a5c0e2fdf7cea535ba03259894dc184e5a4c2800
[2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit
commit: bfdc502a4a4c058bf4cbb1df0c297761d528f54d
[3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb()
commit: 8ac3939db99f99667b8eb670cf4baf292896e72d
[4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded
commit: dbaafbadc5c3dad4010099d0ff135204a8dbff49
[5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits
commit: 123e3016ee9b3674a819537bc4c3174e25cd48fc
[6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
commit: bd8247eee1a2b22e2270b3933ab8dca9316b3718
[7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()
commit: 6bc6c2bdf1baca6522b8d9ba976257d722423085
[8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks
commit: a00b482b82fb098956a5bed22bd7873e56f152f1
[9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption
commit: 8c91c57907d3ad8f88a12097213bb0920eb453b8
Best regards,
--
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-03 0:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-16 7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16 7:02 ` [PATCHv2 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-03 0:41 ` [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).