linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: libaokun@huaweicloud.com, netfs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org, zhujia.zj@bytedance.com,
	jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:29:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de9d403c-c4ed-46c5-a572-18dc48bbd204@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424033409.2735257-6-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>

Hi Baokun,

On 2024/4/24 11:34, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Add missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray,
> otherwise:
> 
> Even with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is
> ensured to be pinned there, while the data structure (e.g. struct
> cachefiles_req) stored in the slot has no such guarantee.  The poll
> routine will iterate the radix tree and dereference cachefiles_req
> accordingly.  Thus RCU read lock is not adequate in this case and
> spinlock is needed here.
> 
> Fixes: b817e22b2e91 ("cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode")
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

I'm not sure why this patch didn't send upstream,
https://gitee.com/anolis/cloud-kernel/commit/324ecaaa10fefb0e3d94b547e3170e40b90cda1f

But since we're now working on upstreaming, so let's drop
the previous in-house review tags..

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>   fs/cachefiles/daemon.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> index 6465e2574230..73ed2323282a 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/daemon.c
> @@ -365,14 +365,14 @@ static __poll_t cachefiles_daemon_poll(struct file *file,
>   
>   	if (cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(cache)) {
>   		if (!xa_empty(&cache->reqs)) {
> -			rcu_read_lock();
> +			xas_lock(&xas);
>   			xas_for_each_marked(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
>   				if (!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
>   					mask |= EPOLLIN;
>   					break;
>   				}
>   			}
> -			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			xas_unlock(&xas);
>   		}
>   	} else {
>   		if (test_bit(CACHEFILES_STATE_CHANGED, &cache->flags))

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24  3:34 [PATCH 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll libaokun
2024-04-24  3:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] cachefiles: stop sending new request when dropping object libaokun
2024-04-24  3:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] cachefiles: flush all requests for the object that is being dropped libaokun
2024-04-24  3:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] cachefiles: flush ondemand_object_worker during clean object libaokun
2024-04-25  5:41   ` Jia Zhu
2024-04-25  6:53     ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24  3:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] cachefiles: cyclic allocation of msg_id to avoid reuse libaokun
2024-04-24  3:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling libaokun
2024-04-24  4:29   ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2024-04-24  6:23     ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24  5:46   ` Jia Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de9d403c-c4ed-46c5-a572-18dc48bbd204@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).