From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fcntl.2, read.2, write.2: document "Lost locks" as cause for EIO.
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:46:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df9a18ce-c412-44aa-d475-77521a7252c5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgi7nttp.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Hello Neil
There's a piece of your patch I don't understand. Please see below.
On 12/13/2017 05:19 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> If an advisory lock is lost, then read/write requests on any
> affected file descriptor can return EIO - for NFSv4 at least.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> man2/fcntl.2 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> man2/read.2 | 9 +++++++++
> man2/write.2 | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man2/fcntl.2 b/man2/fcntl.2
> index 67642384154c..6e6e26f66aa0 100644
> --- a/man2/fcntl.2
> +++ b/man2/fcntl.2
> @@ -669,6 +669,30 @@ and
> Mandatory locking is not specified by POSIX.
> Some other systems also support mandatory locking,
> although the details of how to enable it vary across systems.
> +.SS Lost locks
> +When an advisory lock is obtained on a networked filesystem such as
> +NFS it is possible that the lock might get lost.
> +This may happen due to administrative action on the server, or due to a
> +network partition which lasts long enough for the server to assume
What does "network partition which lasts long enough" mean?
I think this perhaps needs to be clarified a little. At least,
I don't understand it.
Cheers,
Michael
> +that the client is no longer functioning.
> +.PP
> +When the filesystem determines that a lock has been lost, future
> +.BR read (2)
> +or
> +.BR write (2)
> +requests may fail with the error
> +.BR EIO .
> +This error will persist until the lock is removed or the file
> +descriptor is closed.
> +Since Linux 3.12,
> +.\" commit ef1820f9be27b6ad158f433ab38002ab8131db4d
> +this happens at least for NFSv4 including all minor versions.
> +.PP
> +Some versions of Unix send a signal
> +.RB ( SIGLOST )
> +in this circumstance.
> +Linux does not define this signal, and does not provide any
> +asynchronous notification of lost locks.
> .SS Managing signals
> .BR F_GETOWN ,
> .BR F_SETOWN ,
> diff --git a/man2/read.2 b/man2/read.2
> index f2e1379865df..0fea86e523a5 100644
> --- a/man2/read.2
> +++ b/man2/read.2
> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ or its process group
> is orphaned.
> It may also occur when there is a low-level I/O error
> while reading from a disk or tape.
> +A further possible cause of
> +.B EIO
> +on networked filesystems is when an advisory lock had been taken
> +out on the file descriptor and this lock has been lost.
> +See the
> +.I "Lost locks"
> +section of
> +.BR fcntl (2)
> +for further details.
> .TP
> .B EISDIR
> .I fd
> diff --git a/man2/write.2 b/man2/write.2
> index 796cae8ba221..621a484dc3a2 100644
> --- a/man2/write.2
> +++ b/man2/write.2
> @@ -197,6 +197,15 @@ be reported by a subsequent
> (whether or not they were also reported by
> .BR write (2)).
> .\" commit 088737f44bbf6378745f5b57b035e57ee3dc4750
> +An alternate cause of
> +.B EIO
> +on networked filesystems is when an advisory lock had been taken out
> +on the file descriptor and this lock has been lost.
> +See the
> +.I "Lost locks"
> +section of
> +.BR fcntl (2)
> +for further details.
> .TP
> .B ENOSPC
> The device containing the file referred to by
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 4:19 [PATCH] fcntl.2, read.2, write.2: document "Lost locks" as cause for EIO NeilBrown
2017-12-18 16:46 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2017-12-18 21:45 ` NeilBrown
2017-12-19 5:48 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-12-19 20:30 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df9a18ce-c412-44aa-d475-77521a7252c5@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).