linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: kreijack@inwind.it, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	zfs-devel@list.zfsonlinux.org
Subject: Re: Ideas for RAIDZ-like design to solve write-holes, with larger fs block size
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 07:00:06 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e04e525f-8cc1-42c1-b234-e74e06d91446@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466de455-a413-424f-9853-7d7d10abce49@inwind.it>



在 2025/11/29 06:51, Goffredo Baroncelli 写道:
> On 28/11/2025 21.10, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[...]
>>> As wrote above, I suggests to use a "per chunk" fs-bs
>>
>> As mentioned, bs must be per-fs, or writes can not be ensured to be bs 
>> aligned.
> 
> 
> Ok.. try to see from another POV: may be that it would be enough that 
> the allocator  ... allocates space for extent with a specific multiple 
> of ps ?
> This and the fact that an extent is immutable, should be enough...

Nope, things like relocation can easily break the immutable assumption.

That's why I don't think it's even possible to implement a per-chunk 
stripe length, as that will make some extent that's totally bs aligned 
to be not aligned on another chunk.

Thanks,
Qu

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-28 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-28  3:07 Ideas for RAIDZ-like design to solve write-holes, with larger fs block size Qu Wenruo
2025-11-28 19:49 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2025-11-28 20:10   ` Qu Wenruo
2025-11-28 20:21     ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2025-11-28 20:30       ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e04e525f-8cc1-42c1-b234-e74e06d91446@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=zfs-devel@list.zfsonlinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).