From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy2-f42.google.com (mail-dy2-f42.google.com [74.125.229.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DE7370D6B for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.229.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790259569; cv=none; b=AJzj3fAihY+oU6RPmNOHPmwA8m8ZphlRZikn4Qx7w+t6jecqg7cSwsBaZ2I1RIEuy8+9j7U1cFYr6temRUsypWXfW7Ct0z6BsqpTz2qAHDd91PfbV4/6f5E6k/zpbY1cF304OGJU0B1uEn1duI9opmbILTJ5leB/X05EvRKDwLU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790259569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TWdASb3MyAf7mGzhM1GabLO0eutszFmZKdYoyrSrb/g=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tXBI5oN3nAbC3p8OzAiM/9RgUeVvRQJ9gCqHbwumMPCwKUAIzyZ6+rM4s4yPFsVz1IvrlYHm3e2lw3RdLecc0BT8g1E7DZbeS5V5fkWDlqWNhJssnYg/rt3q/mGwgdXPsxZjHVE0ojJLYZjLNYFNDi8dI0hDVPDOvUFaza+w/sY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b=xUsYOoK3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.229.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b="xUsYOoK3" Received: by mail-dy2-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3411e0ace58so71439eec.0 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1790259565; x=1790864365; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=l5t+RkrxBW/tPG0f8s8vACvjj/UzJW53i35clI9VtqY=; b=xUsYOoK3GAHlCcY3Apa/Z4b/UYuwhAOdAh4pYHuimBtUMwFObIHfZeSd8GtmaKBqyh VNScnMR2fSPIqEpCCsYjigBiLXBr3g1EaT0YYmCUJ4KugsX006BE9dQJ47nv65UnYuGd 9sjuAXkibl6VRbaC70Z9QvL9h5eTrdkmTQvuNMfN5fYSNJgMJHRE93sGNB2ht3MowNpV Suq0BxBNGDyVxFPwsC7EovxYj9CmxjJds6rXnn123huZXZcJItEZV6HJZgxfykBJaFFQ kSUADyZ8D5ee3nUtzdtxg/8ktkfurjEmH0H0PaUUuonLrNto10o8WGMyGdjPXsR2ITdv cHVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790259565; x=1790864365; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=l5t+RkrxBW/tPG0f8s8vACvjj/UzJW53i35clI9VtqY=; b=IhPAHlz5JBrR4e39luEXqXE4jh6/5OAkqP5RL9QsYpLrTgG1FMYTKaAQQ2TT9Dw/6O nArQpNXJd7ktaIekf/vLXs3z1/gmxbjfx7LLOWhKEfhZAE/6746UzT9OFRZnDZf8QsV+ 3KYMWdgcjzZmydEHF9QGNrFTjuTpvK852WiwOqsrD+17nb0MqZHm4U/iLtl3DWQRwgsj Yiv5KvYrydXj+nVuVLkAyHu9WFkT3SgV3MfQtK24gDMPQ1iPNdLlqRMO8jFQ/eZjfdZ3 EDvlwLlwCGVSecqwT9u3ZzMNR6hU34F1Z1sMnUFv26kpOZnhH4o1yMheoYfoyyCJQ7T1 I5xg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxWKchd6E0HbK3Gh9Y3sogvxcnBkngwnrOD6kOsCOu1z2uJryrqPiXDEWk02Y821VzNbOjkOMdwHAvWx9MO@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++kxG1Kyylif4dSXr7+E2V8cZQGo1AV9IZg9f4nV95Sh1Vph3Jek tVVQdCXctT/Wtj7Jfjbvv0NHgQp6cezrW5QAhkEzhcgFqTE1VflSg1pRdD3FZ3ZHL3M= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2gWTuINi6TqVzHB9lSQlMoQw7BQdV3ZGr3mL0m5cinBvkkClnyJCLXUytK89y LCvfXirZvXxGGCFn7thUFiRpcOGTzY1KCfuSDTO+rkhqqZcEPg6muto/kOJBrKXfhR5Gq8U+SFO oDP+E6rkacnD2rATtilg3iMmtlUV6J6wtEi0OHy7uqbjNbvzyDjUSiSdn/0Yrl1ZLGSkvKyZS5L SM8kNz0ds8FOu42JAXcgjw1A6RLs+2HhF58KuKTiBWTqdWCkM6eRguYKU9rZiWJAetDCiAEr+qv 51cLPjRcs4AtN+95e3palcG29jRrMUMS87Fshxv+hqHd7K4l7kP6an50lQCWoW6D/cFf7XIIsgL ylb7B2JOD6YYq7uxvHXB9dexeMdL6e6CtAWc4id1aBr1+FmICHSCeL/oXEnKLYyHwwSaznsJ4Ql iDNySkQYOFrjCIG1l0CfvpK4XzbA0tFeobBVQcH+lq0eJ9BajZAXh+tjLUYypWQLpmVEPQn8Q7f C38UHpGPIyLjfLPjn2YPTPNn5/Zea2dn6MGMVNT9X1tYxEeEU+SK45QOg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:693c:87c7:20b0:33b:f566:eca9 with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-34001c1401fmr2175061eec.11.1790259563746; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-33e9684ed70sm12529265eec.19.2026.09.24.07.19.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:19:22 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/17] exec: cancel io_uring requests before de_thread() To: Christian Brauner , Oleg Nesterov , Chris Mason , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , NeilBrown , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20260921-work-coredump-fixes-v3-0-8e4adb1619e6@kernel.org> <20260921-work-coredump-fixes-v3-12-8e4adb1619e6@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20260921-work-coredump-fixes-v3-12-8e4adb1619e6@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/21/26 7:45 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > begin_new_exec() cancels the exec'ing thread's io_uring requests after > de_thread() made it the only thread in the thread-group. Now > io_uring_task_cancel() runs task work after. If it runs a > create_worker_cb() item then a io-wq queued on the thread before the > exec creates a new io-wq worker thread. > > Said thread joins the thread-group which de_thread() just took down. The > io-iwq sticks around until it notices that its workqueue is dying. But > code after de_thread() relies on being single-threaded. > > Move io_uring_task_cancel() before de_thread() but behind the point of > no return. Any worker created during task work run from > io_uring_task_cancel() is just a sibling thread that de_thread() will > take down and reap. > > Once io_uring_task_cancel() returned the thread has neither a task > context nor a workqueue left so nothing can add a thread behind > de_thread()'s back anymore. Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe -- Jens Axboe