From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Any bio_clone_slow() implementation which doesn't share bi_io_vec?
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:18:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3fce9af-429c-a1e3-3f0b-4d90fa061d94@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZ3XH2PWwrIl/XMy@infradead.org>
On 2021/11/24 14:09, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:07:18AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> In that case, the missing piece seems to be a way to convert a splitted
>> plain bio into a REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND bio.
>>
>> Can this be done without slow bvec copying?
>
> Yes. I have a WIP stacking driver that converts writes to zone appends
> and it does just that:
>
> sector_t orig_sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> unsigned int bio_flags = bio->bi_opf & ~REQ_OP_MASK;
>
> ...
>
> clone = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, &bdev->write_bio_set);
>
> ...
>
> clone->bi_opf = REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND | REQ_NOMERGE | bio_flags;
Just so simple? Then that's super awesome.
But I'm a little concerned about the bio_add_hw_page() call in
bio_add_zoned_append().
It's not exactly the same as bio_add_page().
Does it mean as long as our splitted bio doesn't exceed zone limit, we
can do the convert without any further problem?
Thanks,
Qu
> bio_set_dev(clone, dev->lower_bdev);
> clone->bi_iter.bi_sector = zone_sector;
> trace_block_bio_remap(clone, disk_devt(disk), orig_sector);
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
> ---end quoted text---
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 6:44 Any bio_clone_slow() implementation which doesn't share bi_io_vec? Qu Wenruo
2021-11-23 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 8:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-11-23 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 11:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-11-23 11:39 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-11-23 14:28 ` hch
2021-11-23 23:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-11-24 6:09 ` hch
2021-11-24 6:18 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-11-24 7:02 ` hch
2021-11-24 7:22 ` hch
2021-11-24 7:25 ` Naohiro Aota
2021-11-24 7:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-11-26 12:33 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3fce9af-429c-a1e3-3f0b-4d90fa061d94@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).