From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.etersoft.ru ([91.232.225.46]:55008 "EHLO mail.etersoft.ru"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753144AbdKNLhx (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:37:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:37:51 +0300
From: Vitaly Lipatov <lav@etersoft.ru>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/fcntl: restore checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX for
 F_GETLK64
In-Reply-To: <1510658957.5027.12.camel@kernel.org>
References: <20171114013009.26716-1-lav@etersoft.ru>
 <1510658957.5027.12.camel@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <eceac170a3481d6fc74857460c10b50f@etersoft.ru>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Jeff Layton =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB 14.11.17 14:29:
> (cc'ing Christoph since he wrote the original patch)
>=20
> This patch looks correct to me, but could we rename it to
> fixup_compat_flock64 to match the other functions here?
Sure, feel free to make any renames and so on.

--=20
=D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC,
=D0=92=D0=B8=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=9B=D0=B8=D0=BF=D0=B0=D1=82=
=D0=BE=D0=B2,
Etersoft