Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] create simple libfs directory iterator and make efivarfs use it
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:45:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efa9428042d721979efe9a351dfbfb779833b467.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70ba7c8e2cdc4c76f71274c9aaf77b360692613d.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 12:46 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> I assume you won't like the way I have to allocate and toss a cursor
> for each iteration, nor the fact that there's still the
> cond_resched() in there?  I think I can fix that but I'd have to
> slice apart simple_positive(), which is a bigger undertaking.

So this is what I think that would look like: it still exports the same
simple_next_child() function but doesn't need to allocate cursors or do
any of the cond_resched() stuff.  The down side is that the slice is a
lot less easily verified than the other two patches, so this one's
going to need a lot of code inspection to make sure I got it right.

Regards,

James

---

 fs/libfs.c         | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fs.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index 8444f5cc4064..3a32910f44dc 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -101,6 +101,34 @@ int dcache_dir_close(struct inode *inode, struct
file *file)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dcache_dir_close);
 
+/*
+ * helper for positive scanning.  Requires a nested while loop which should
+ * be broken if this returns false
+ */
+static bool internal_scan_positive(struct hlist_node **p, struct dentry *d,
+				   struct dentry **found, loff_t *count)
+{
+	while (*p) {
+		p = &d->d_sib.next;
+
+		// we must at least skip cursors, to avoid livelocks
+		if (d->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_CURSOR)
+			continue;
+
+		if (simple_positive(d) && !--*count) {
+			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
+			if (simple_positive(d))
+				*found = dget_dlock(d);
+			spin_unlock(&d->d_lock);
+			if (likely(*found))
+				return true;
+			*count = 1;
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 /* parent is locked at least shared */
 /*
  * Returns an element of siblings' list.
@@ -118,19 +146,9 @@ static struct dentry *scan_positives(struct dentry *cursor,
 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 	while (*p) {
 		struct dentry *d = hlist_entry(*p, struct dentry, d_sib);
-		p = &d->d_sib.next;
-		// we must at least skip cursors, to avoid livelocks
-		if (d->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_CURSOR)
-			continue;
-		if (simple_positive(d) && !--count) {
-			spin_lock_nested(&d->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
-			if (simple_positive(d))
-				found = dget_dlock(d);
-			spin_unlock(&d->d_lock);
-			if (likely(found))
-				break;
-			count = 1;
-		}
+
+		if (internal_scan_positive(p, d, &found, &count))
+			break;
 		if (need_resched()) {
 			if (!hlist_unhashed(&cursor->d_sib))
 				__hlist_del(&cursor->d_sib);
@@ -146,6 +164,47 @@ static struct dentry *scan_positives(struct dentry *cursor,
 	return found;
 }
 
+/**
+ * simple_next_child - get next child of the parent directory
+ *
+ * @parent: the directory to scan
+ * @child: last child (or NULL to start at the beginning)
+ *
+ * returns the next positive child in sequence with the reference
+ * elevated but if a child is passed in will drop that
+ * reference. Returns NULL on either error or when directory has been
+ * fully scanned.
+ *
+ * The intended use is as an iterator because all the references will
+ * be dropped by the end of the while loop:
+ *
+ *     child = NULL
+ *     while(child = simple_next_child(parent, child)) {
+ *          // do something
+ *     }
+ */
+struct dentry *simple_next_child(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry *child)
+{
+	struct hlist_node **p;
+	loff_t count = 1;
+	struct dentry *found = NULL;
+
+	if (child)
+		p = &child->d_sib.next;
+	else
+		p = &parent->d_children.first;
+
+	while (*p) {
+		struct dentry *d = hlist_entry(*p, struct dentry, d_sib);
+
+		if (internal_scan_positive(p, d, &found, &count))
+			break;
+	}
+	dput(child);
+	return found;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_next_child);
+
 loff_t dcache_dir_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 2788df98080f..dd84d1c3b8af 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -3531,6 +3531,8 @@ extern int simple_rename(struct mnt_idmap *, struct inode *,
 			 unsigned int);
 extern void simple_recursive_removal(struct dentry *,
                               void (*callback)(struct dentry *));
+extern struct dentry *simple_next_child(struct dentry *parent,
+					struct dentry *child);
 extern int noop_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
 extern ssize_t noop_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter);
 extern int simple_empty(struct dentry *);
-- 
2.43.0



      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 19:41 [RFC PATCH 0/3] create simple libfs directory iterator and make efivarfs use it James Bottomley
2025-03-18 19:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] libfs: rework dcache_readdir to use an internal function with callback James Bottomley
2025-03-18 21:32   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-18 21:49     ` James Bottomley
2025-03-18 19:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] libfs: add simple directory iteration " James Bottomley
2025-03-18 21:33   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-18 21:50     ` James Bottomley
2025-03-18 19:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] efivarfs: replace iterate_dir with libfs function simple_iterate_call James Bottomley
2025-03-18 21:34   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] create simple libfs directory iterator and make efivarfs use it Al Viro
2025-03-18 23:49   ` Al Viro
2025-03-19 16:46   ` James Bottomley
2025-03-19 18:45     ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efa9428042d721979efe9a351dfbfb779833b467.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox