linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 5/9] ext4: Rename ext4_set_bits to mb_set_bits
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:32:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1f6ece1405b76a7a987e9145d1adfaf71e30695.1644992610.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1644992609.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

ext4_set_bits() should actually be mb_set_bits() for uniform API naming
convention.
This is via below cmd -

grep -nr "ext4_set_bits" fs/ext4/ | cut -d ":" -f 1 | xargs sed -i 's/ext4_set_bits/mb_set_bits/g'

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |  2 +-
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 +++++++-------
 fs/ext4/resize.c  |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index bcd3b9bf8069..97c85ae185a9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
 #define ext4_find_next_zero_bit		find_next_zero_bit_le
 #define ext4_find_next_bit		find_next_bit_le
 
-extern void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len);
+extern void mb_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len);
 
 /*
  * Maximal mount counts between two filesystem checks
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 7b80c5dd9f40..c2a6f924b456 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ static int mb_test_and_clear_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
 	return zero_bit;
 }
 
-void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
+void mb_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len)
 {
 	__u32 *addr;
 
@@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
 	mb_set_largest_free_order(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info);
 
 	mb_update_avg_fragment_size(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info);
-	ext4_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0);
+	mb_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0);
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		 * We leak some of the blocks here.
 		 */
 		ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
-		ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
+		mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
 			      ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
 		ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
 		err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
@@ -3844,7 +3844,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		}
 	}
 #endif
-	ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
+	mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start,
 		      ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
 	if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
 	    (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
@@ -3939,7 +3939,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 
 		clen_changed = clen - already;
 		if (state)
-			ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
+			mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
 		else
 			mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
 		if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
 
 	while (n) {
 		entry = rb_entry(n, struct ext4_free_data, efd_node);
-		ext4_set_bits(bitmap, entry->efd_start_cluster, entry->efd_count);
+		mb_set_bits(bitmap, entry->efd_start_cluster, entry->efd_count);
 		n = rb_next(n);
 	}
 	return;
@@ -4500,7 +4500,7 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_from_pa(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
 		if (unlikely(len == 0))
 			continue;
 		BUG_ON(groupnr != group);
-		ext4_set_bits(bitmap, start, len);
+		mb_set_bits(bitmap, start, len);
 		preallocated += len;
 	}
 	mb_debug(sb, "preallocated %d for group %u\n", preallocated, group);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index ee8f02f406cb..f507f34be602 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int set_flexbg_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, handle_t *handle,
 		}
 		ext4_debug("mark block bitmap %#04llx (+%llu/%u)\n",
 			   first_cluster, first_cluster - start, count2);
-		ext4_set_bits(bh->b_data, first_cluster - start, count2);
+		mb_set_bits(bh->b_data, first_cluster - start, count2);
 
 		err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bh);
 		brelse(bh);
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int setup_new_flex_group_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
 		if (overhead != 0) {
 			ext4_debug("mark backup superblock %#04llx (+0)\n",
 				   start);
-			ext4_set_bits(bh->b_data, 0,
+			mb_set_bits(bh->b_data, 0,
 				      EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, overhead));
 		}
 		ext4_mark_bitmap_end(EXT4_B2C(sbi, group_data[i].blocks_count),
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16  7:02 [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] ext4: Correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/9] ext4: Fixes ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 3/9] ext4: Refactor ext4_free_blocks() to pull out ext4_mb_clear_bb() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid() Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 8/9] ext4: Add strict range checks while freeing blocks Ritesh Harjani
2022-02-16  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to prevent against possible corruption Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-03  0:41 ` [PATCHv2 0/9] ext4: fast_commit fixes, stricter block checking & cleanups Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f1f6ece1405b76a7a987e9145d1adfaf71e30695.1644992610.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).