From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Holden Karau" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <454765AC.1050905@xandros.com> <87mz7cqvd8.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> <87slh4tesh.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> <87odrst22f.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Holden Karau" , "Josef Sipek" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "akpm@osdl.org" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Nick Piggin" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:39005 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946505AbWKACdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:13 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c2so574864nfe for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:33:12 -0800 (PST) To: "OGAWA Hirofumi" In-Reply-To: <87odrst22f.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 & fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-) On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > "Holden Karau" writes: > > > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not > > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all > > that]. > > Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT. > And the your patch didn't make performance better, right? > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi > -- Cell: 613-276-1645