From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix the time handling macros when ext4 is using small inodes
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:54:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f541027cca189c42550136aab27b89889cd2fdd3.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720144807.GC5764@mit.edu>
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 10:48 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 06:32:19AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If ext4 is using small on-disk inodes, then it may not be able to store
> > fine grained timestamps. It also can't store the i_crtime at all in that
> > case since that fully lives in the extended part of the inode.
> >
> > 979492850abd got the EXT4_EINODE_{GET,SET}_XTIME macros wrong, and would
> > still store the tv_sec field of the i_crtime into the raw_inode, even
> > when they were small, corrupting adjacent memory.
> >
> > This fixes those macros to skip setting anything in the raw_inode if the
> > tv_sec field doesn't fit, and to properly return a {0,0} timestamp when
> > the raw_inode doesn't support it.
> >
> > Also, fix a bug in ctime handling during rename. It was updating the
> > renamed inode's ctime twice rather than the old directory.
> >
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Fixes: 979492850abd ("ext4: convert to ctime accessor functions")
> > Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>
> I assume this is will be applied to the vfs.ctime branch, yes?
>
> - Ted
Yes. Ideally it'll be folded into the ext4 patch there.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 10:32 [PATCH v2] ext4: fix the time handling macros when ext4 is using small inodes Jeff Layton
2023-07-20 14:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-20 14:54 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-07-24 8:34 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-24 8:32 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f541027cca189c42550136aab27b89889cd2fdd3.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).