linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, chandan.babu@oracle.com,
	willy@infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] iomap: Sub-extent zeroing
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 11:23:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6a618e6-a00e-483d-bd6b-c7d58ff5b2fa@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjGVuBi6XeJYo4Ca@dread.disaster.area>

On 01/05/2024 02:07, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 05:47:39PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> For FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN support, we want to treat any sub-extent IO like
>> sub-fsblock DIO, in that we will zero the sub-extent when the mapping is
>> unwritten.
>>
>> This will be important for atomic writes support, in that atomically
>> writing over a partially written extent would mean that we would need to
>> do the unwritten extent conversion write separately, and the write could
>> no longer be atomic.
>>
>> It is the task of the FS to set iomap.extent_size per iter to indicate
>> sub-extent zeroing required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> 
> Shouldn't this be done before the XFS feature is enabled in the
> series?

Well, it is done before XFS iomap zeroing support patch. But I can move 
this patch to the very beginning of the series.

> 
>> ---
>>   fs/iomap/direct-io.c  | 17 +++++++++++------
>>   include/linux/iomap.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> index f3b43d223a46..a3ed7cfa95bc 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>>   {
>>   	const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
>>   	struct inode *inode = iter->inode;
>> -	unsigned int fs_block_size = i_blocksize(inode), pad;
>> +	unsigned int zeroing_size, pad;
>>   	loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
>>   	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
>>   	blk_opf_t bio_opf;
>> @@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>>   	size_t copied = 0;
>>   	size_t orig_count;
>>   
>> +	if (iomap->extent_size)
>> +		zeroing_size = iomap->extent_size;
>> +	else
>> +		zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode);
> 
> Oh, the dissonance!
> 
> iomap->extent_size isn't an extent size at all.

Right, it's a poorly chosen name

> 
> The size of the extent the iomap returns is iomap->length. This new
> variable is the IO specific "block size" that should be assumed by
> the dio code to determine if padding should be done.
> 
> IOWs, I think we should add an "io_block_size" field to the iomap,
> and every filesystem that supports iomap should set it to the
> filesystem block size (i_blocksize(inode)). Then the changes to the
> iomap code end up just being:
> 
> 
> -	unsigned int fs_block_size = i_blocksize(inode), pad;
> +	unsigned int fs_block_size = iomap->io_block_size, pad;
> 
> And the patch that introduces that infrastructure change will also
> change all the filesystem implementations to unconditionally set
> iomap->io_block_size to i_blocksize().

ok

> 
> Then, in a separate patch, you can add XFS support for large IO
> block sizes when we have either a large rtextsize or extent size
> hints set.

I hadn't been considering large rtextsize for this. I suppose that it 
could be added.

> 
>> +
>>   	if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1) ||
>>   	    !bdev_iter_is_aligned(iomap->bdev, dio->submit.iter))
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -354,8 +359,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>>   		dio->iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_HIPRI;
>>   
>>   	if (need_zeroout) {
>> -		/* zero out from the start of the block to the write offset */
>> -		pad = pos & (fs_block_size - 1);
>> +		/* zero out from the start of the region to the write offset */
>> +		pad = pos & (zeroing_size - 1);
>>   		if (pad)
>>   			iomap_dio_zero(iter, dio, pos - pad, pad);
>>   	}
>> @@ -428,10 +433,10 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>>   zero_tail:
>>   	if (need_zeroout ||
>>   	    ((dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) && pos >= i_size_read(inode))) {
>> -		/* zero out from the end of the write to the end of the block */
>> -		pad = pos & (fs_block_size - 1);
>> +		/* zero out from the end of the write to the end of the region */
>> +		pad = pos & (zeroing_size - 1);
>>   		if (pad)
>> -			iomap_dio_zero(iter, dio, pos, fs_block_size - pad);
>> +			iomap_dio_zero(iter, dio, pos, zeroing_size - pad);
>>   	}
>>   out:
>>   	/* Undo iter limitation to current extent */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> index 6fc1c858013d..42623b1cdc04 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct iomap {
>>   	u64			length;	/* length of mapping, bytes */
>>   	u16			type;	/* type of mapping */
>>   	u16			flags;	/* flags for mapping */
>> +	unsigned int		extent_size;
> 
> This needs a descriptive comment. At minimum, it should tell the
> reader what units are used for the variable.  If it is bytes, then
> it needs to be a u64, because XFS can have extent size hints well
> beyond 2^32 bytes in length.
> 

ok

Thanks,
John


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-01 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-29 17:47 [PATCH v3 00/21] block atomic writes for XFS John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] fs: Add generic_atomic_write_valid_size() John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] xfs: only allow minlen allocations when near ENOSPC John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] xfs: always tail align maxlen allocations John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] xfs: simplify extent allocation alignment John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] xfs: introduce forced allocation alignment John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] fs: xfs: align args->minlen for " John Garry
2024-06-05 14:26   ` John Garry
2024-06-06  8:47     ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-06 16:22       ` John Garry
2024-06-07  6:04         ` John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-04-30 23:22   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 10:03     ` John Garry
2024-05-02  0:50       ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-02  7:56         ` John Garry
2024-06-12  2:10   ` Long Li
2024-06-12  6:55     ` John Garry
2024-06-12 15:43       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-13  2:04         ` Long Li
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign John Garry
2024-04-30 22:54   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01  8:30     ` John Garry
2024-05-02  1:11       ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-02  8:55         ` John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] xfs: Update xfs_is_falloc_aligned() mask " John Garry
2024-04-30 23:35   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 10:48     ` John Garry
2024-05-01 23:45       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/21] xfs: Unmap blocks according to forcealign John Garry
2024-05-01  0:10   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 10:54     ` John Garry
2024-06-06  9:50     ` John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/21] xfs: Only free full extents for forcealign John Garry
2024-05-01  0:53   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 11:24     ` John Garry
2024-05-01 23:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-02  3:12       ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] iomap: Sub-extent zeroing John Garry
2024-05-01  1:07   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 10:23     ` John Garry [this message]
2024-05-30 10:40     ` John Garry
2024-07-26 14:29     ` John Garry
2024-07-26 17:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-29 17:02         ` John Garry
2024-08-22 20:35         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-11  3:10   ` Long Li
2024-06-11  7:29     ` John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] fs: xfs: " John Garry
2024-05-01  1:32   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 11:36     ` John Garry
2024-05-02  1:26       ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-05-01  1:47   ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 11:08     ` John Garry
2024-05-02  1:43       ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-02  9:12         ` John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-04-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6a618e6-a00e-483d-bd6b-c7d58ff5b2fa@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbongio@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).