From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Svyatoslav Feldsherov <feldsherov@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: syzbot+6ba92bd00d5093f7e371@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
oferz@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: do not update freeing inode io_list
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:25:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd7ebc60-811e-588a-5c55-ee540796f058@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114212155.221829-1-feldsherov@google.com>
Hi--
Please see a small nit below.
On 11/14/22 13:21, Svyatoslav Feldsherov wrote:
> After commit cbfecb927f42 ("fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode
> already has I_DIRTY_INODE") writeiback_single_inode can push inode with
> I_DIRTY_TIME set to b_dirty_time list. In case of freeing inode with
> I_DIRTY_TIME set this can happened after deletion of inode io_list at
> evict. Stack trace is following.
>
> evict
> fat_evict_inode
> fat_truncate_blocks
> fat_flush_inodes
> writeback_inode
> sync_inode_metadata(inode, sync=0)
> writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc) <- wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE
>
> This will lead to use after free in flusher thread.
>
> Similar issue can be triggered if writeback_single_inode in the
> stack trace update inode->io_list. Add explicit check to avoid it.
>
> Fixes: cbfecb927f42 ("fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE")
> Reported-by: syzbot+6ba92bd00d5093f7e371@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Feldsherov <feldsherov@google.com>
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - address review comments
> - skip inode_cgwb_move_to_attached for freeing inode
>
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 443f83382b9b..c4aea096689c 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1712,18 +1712,26 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
> wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode);
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> /*
> - * If the inode is now fully clean, then it can be safely removed from
> - * its writeback list (if any). Otherwise the flusher threads are
> - * responsible for the writeback lists.
> + * If the inode is freeing, it's io_list shoudn't be updated
its
> + * as it can be finally deleted at this moment.
> */
> - if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
> - inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(inode, wb);
> - else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED)) {
> - if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
> - redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
> - else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
> - inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> - inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time);
> + if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
> + /*
> + * If the inode is now fully clean, then it can be safely
> + * removed from its writeback list (if any). Otherwise the
> + * flusher threads are responsible for the writeback lists.
> + */
> + if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
> + inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(inode, wb);
> + else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED)) {
> + if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
> + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
> + else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
> + inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> + inode_io_list_move_locked(inode,
> + wb,
> + &wb->b_dirty_time);
> + }
> }
> }
>
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-13 15:24 [PATCH] fs: do not push freeing inode to b_dirty_time list Svyatoslav Feldsherov
2022-11-14 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-14 17:43 ` Svyatoslav Feldsherov
2022-11-14 19:21 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-14 21:21 ` [PATCH v2] fs: do not update freeing inode io_list Svyatoslav Feldsherov
2022-11-14 21:25 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2022-11-15 9:19 ` Svyatoslav Feldsherov
2022-11-15 10:55 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-15 20:28 ` Svyatoslav Feldsherov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd7ebc60-811e-588a-5c55-ee540796f058@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=feldsherov@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oferz@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+6ba92bd00d5093f7e371@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).