From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add bio_iov_iter_nvecs for figuring out nr_vecs
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:17:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdbfe981-0251-9641-6ed8-db034c0f0148@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201125936.GA25111@infradead.org>
On 01/12/2020 12:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:52:51PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> But the only reason we want to know 'nr_vecs' is so we can allocate a
>> BIO which has that many vecs, right? But we then don't actually use the
>> vecs in the bio because we use the ones already present in the iter.
>> That was why I had it return 1, not nr_vecs.
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>
> Right now __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages does not reuse the bvecs in the
> iter. That being said while we are optmizing this path we might a well
> look into reusing them..
I was thinking about memcpy bvec instead of iterating as a first step,
and then try to reuse passed in bvec.
A thing that doesn't play nice with that is setting BIO_WORKINGSET in
__bio_add_page(), which requires to iterate all pages anyway. I have no
clue what it is, so rather to ask if we can optimise it out somehow?
Apart from pre-computing for specific cases...
E.g. can pages of a single bvec segment be both in and out of a working
set? (i.e. PageWorkingset(page)).
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 12:06 [PATCH] block: add bio_iov_iter_nvecs for figuring out nr_vecs Ming Lei
2020-12-01 12:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-01 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:17 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-12-01 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-01 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 13:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-03 22:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-03 23:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-04 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-10 13:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-11 13:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 14:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-02 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 16:56 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-07 18:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-08 1:21 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 2:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdbfe981-0251-9641-6ed8-db034c0f0148@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).