From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, libaokun@linux.alibaba.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yizhang089@gmail.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
yukuai@fnnas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ext4: factor out journalled block zeroing range
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 17:48:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gvsj27lkqxs6xy7rdiyarw5ocjuvqrrn2knx5jo45eoc7tw6no@kow27zlgjy5r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310014101.4140698-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
On Tue 10-03-26 09:40:55, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> Refactor __ext4_block_zero_page_range() by separating the block zeroing
> operations for ordered data mode and journal data mode into two distinct
> functions:
>
> - ext4_block_do_zero_range(): handles non-journal data mode with
> ordered data support
> - ext4_block_journalled_zero_range(): handles journal data mode
>
> Also extract a common helper, ext4_block_get_zero_range(), to handle
> buffer head and folio retrieval, along with the associated error
> handling. This prepares for converting the partial block zero range to
> the iomap infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Just one nit below. Otherwise feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 52c6a86ad9f9..d63d455831b9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -4002,13 +4002,12 @@ void ext4_set_aops(struct inode *inode)
> * ext4_punch_hole, etc) which needs to be properly zeroed out. Otherwise a
> * racing writeback can come later and flush the stale pagecache to disk.
> */
> -static int __ext4_block_zero_page_range(handle_t *handle,
> - struct address_space *mapping, loff_t from, loff_t length,
> - bool *did_zero)
> +static struct buffer_head *ext4_block_get_zero_range(struct inode *inode,
> + loff_t from, loff_t length)
I'd call this function ext4_load_tail_bh() and AFAICT the 'length' argument
is unused so it can be dropped.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 1:40 [PATCH 00/10] ext4: refactor partial block zero-out for iomap conversion Zhang Yi
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: add did_zero output parameter to ext4_block_zero_page_range() Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:33 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] ext4: ext4_block_truncate_page() returns zeroed length on success Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:34 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] ext4: rename and extend ext4_block_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] ext4: factor out journalled block zeroing range Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:48 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2026-03-24 3:16 ` Zhang Yi
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] ext4: rename ext4_block_zero_page_range() to ext4_block_zero_range() Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:49 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: move ordered data handling out of ext4_block_do_zero_range() Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 16:59 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-24 3:17 ` Zhang Yi
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] ext4: remove handle parameters from zero partial block functions Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 17:27 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: pass allocate range as loff_t to ext4_alloc_file_blocks() Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 17:06 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:41 ` [PATCH 09/10] ext4: move zero partial block range functions out of active handle Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 20:17 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-24 3:10 ` Zhang Yi
2026-03-24 3:14 ` Zhang Yi
2026-03-24 13:56 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-10 1:41 ` [PATCH 10/10] ext4: zero post-EOF partial block before appending write Zhang Yi
2026-03-23 20:31 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-24 3:29 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gvsj27lkqxs6xy7rdiyarw5ocjuvqrrn2knx5jo45eoc7tw6no@kow27zlgjy5r \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yizhang089@gmail.com \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox