From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:03:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170528020144.3dgchl3wegukth2i@jeyu>
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:01:45PM -0700, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [25/05/17 17:44 -0700]:
> > kmod <= v19 was broken -- it could return 0 to modprobe calls,
> > incorrectly assuming that a kernel module was built-in, whereas in
> > reality the module was just forming in the kernel. The reason for this
> > is an incorrect userspace heuristics. A userspace kmod fix is available
> > for it [0], however should userspace break again we could go on with
> > an failed get_fs_type() which is hard to debug as the request_module()
> > is detected as returning 0. The first suspect would be that there is
> > something worth with the kernel's module loader and obviously in this
> > case that is not the issue.
> >
> > Since these issues are painful to debug complain when we know userspace
> > has outright lied to us.
> >
> > [0] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git/commit/libkmod/libkmod-module.c?id=fd44a98ae2eb5eb32161088954ab21e58e19dfc4
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/filesystems.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/filesystems.c b/fs/filesystems.c
> > index cac75547d35c..0f477a5de6ea 100644
> > --- a/fs/filesystems.c
> > +++ b/fs/filesystems.c
> > @@ -275,8 +275,10 @@ struct file_system_type *get_fs_type(const char *name)
> > int len = dot ? dot - name : strlen(name);
> >
> > fs = __get_fs_type(name, len);
> > - if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0))
> > + if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0)) {
> > + WARN_ONCE(!fs, "request_module fs-%.*s succeeded, but still no fs?\n", len, name);
>
> The WARN needs to go below the second __get_fs_type() attempt, no?
> Because we want to try __get_fs_type() again right after
> request_module(), to see if the fs loaded, and _then_ WARN if it
> doesn't appear to be loaded.
Doh, yes, sorry will send v2.
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-26 0:44 [PATCH] fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-28 2:01 ` Jessica Yu
2017-06-01 18:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170601180347.GL8951@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.