From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PG_updatodate vs BH_updatodate
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:14:52 +0100
Message-ID: <m2r652y6yr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2prko3ff4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20081123041938.GW3186@webber.adilger.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]:30046 "EHLO
	mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756350AbYKWMO7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:14:59 -0500
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1753858muf.1
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:14:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20081123041938.GW3186@webber.adilger.int> (Andreas Dilger's message of "Sat\, 22 Nov 2008 22\:19\:38 -0600")
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hello,

Thanks for your answer.

Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> writes:

> There may be multiple buffers on a single page, and in some cases
> one buffer on a page can be uptodate while another buffer on the
> same page is not.

Can this really happen ?

Are there any cases where a page can be partially uptodate ?

Francis