From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:10:08 +0400 Message-ID: References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:14757 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030250AbWFIQIX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:08:23 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:40:14 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Linus Torvalds (LT) writes: LT> Quite frankly, at this point, there's no way in hell I believe we can do LT> major surgery on ext3. It's the main filesystem for a lot of users, and LT> it's just not worth the instability worries unless it's something very LT> obviously transparent. I believe it's as stable as before until you mount with extents mount option. thanks, Alex