From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:26:26 +0400 Message-ID: References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel , Mingming Cao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:13:27 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Christoph Hellwig (CH) writes: CH> If you guys want big storage on linux please help improving the filesystems CH> design for that, e.g. jfs or xfs instead of showhorning it onto ext3 thus CH> both making ext3 less reliable for us desktop/small server users and not get CH> the full thing for the big storage people either. proposed patches don't touch existing code paths. extents may be enabled/disabled on per-file basis. thanks, Alex