From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext3 writepages for writeback mode Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:29:57 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1108085493.20053.1191.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050210175327.7b4a508b.akpm@osdl.org> <1108164542.20053.1232.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050211155858.354520bb.akpm@osdl.org> <1108169488.20053.1241.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <420E9098.9000903@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Tomas , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com Received: from [83.102.214.158] ([83.102.214.158]:28068 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261215AbVBLXbp (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:31:45 -0500 To: Badari Pulavarty In-Reply-To: <420E9098.9000903@us.ibm.com> (Badari Pulavarty's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:26:16 -0800") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Badari Pulavarty (BP) writes: >> UP, after: >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m21.452s user 0m0.026s sys 0m6.105s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m23.317s user 0m0.027s sys 0m4.206s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m25.190s user 0m0.022s sys 0m4.026s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m25.024s user 0m0.021s sys 0m4.103s >> UP, before: >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m19.138s user 0m0.021s sys 0m5.980s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m23.123s user 0m0.026s sys 0m4.083s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m25.152s user 0m0.017s sys 0m3.836s >> [root@zefir root]# time /work/tests/fwrite /test/fff 64 10000 >> real 0m25.217s user 0m0.026s sys 0m3.827s BP> Hmm.. On UP, the patch made sys.time little worse ? grrrr. sorry, that's a typo. exchange 'after' and 'before' please. btw, want to see how delayed allocation manages this? thanks, Alex