From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:33:18 +0400 Message-ID: References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> <44898476.80401@garzik.org> <4489874C.1020108@garzik.org> <44899113.3070509@garzik.org> <170fa0d20606090921x71719ad3m7f9387ba15413b8f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mingming Cao , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Tomas Return-path: To: "Mike Snitzer" In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20606090921x71719ad3m7f9387ba15413b8f@mail.gmail.com> (Mike Snitzer's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:21:39 -0400") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Mike Snitzer (MS) writes: MS> precludes their ability to boot older kernels (steps can be taken to MS> make them well aware of this). The "real world situation" you refer MS> to, while hypothetically valid, isn't something informed MS> ext3-with-extents users will _ever_ elect to do. one who needs/wants to go back may get rid of extents by: a) remounting w/o extents option b) copying new-fashion-style files so that copies use blockmap c) dropping extents feature in superblock thanks, Alex