From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: Lazy block allocation and block_prepare_write? Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:04:49 +0400 Message-ID: References: <8e70aacf05041717546fdff3f@mail.gmail.com> <42647484.5040208@us.ibm.com> <1113922091.26913.420.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Tomas , Martin Jambor , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from [83.102.214.158] ([83.102.214.158]:33208 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261600AbVDSPGW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:06:22 -0400 To: Badari Pulavarty In-Reply-To: <1113922091.26913.420.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> (Badari Pulavarty's message of "19 Apr 2005 07:48:12 -0700") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Badari Pulavarty (BP) writes: >> you can introduce one more bit to page->flags BP> Agreed. I was hoping to avoid it as much as I can. well, you're gonna modify mpage api anyway ... BP> What I meant by jounalling mode is that - after the pages are submitted BP> for IO, we need some way of waiting for the IOs to finish inorder to BP> guarantee the ordering ? Is this not needed for anything other than BP> ext3 ? 1) i'm not sure anyone else supports this 2) Andrew proposed the excelent solution thanks, Alex