From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:25:03 +0400 Message-ID: References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <44899D93.5030008@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Tomas , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:47057 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030281AbWFIQY5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:24:57 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <44899D93.5030008@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:10:59 -0400") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes: JG> If it will remain a mount option, if it is never made the default JG> (either in kernel or distro level), then only 1% of users will ever JG> use the feature. And we shouldn't merge a 1% use feature into the JG> _main_ filesystem for Linux. strictly speaking, not that many users really need >2TB fs ... thanks, Alex