linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v2] block: remove plugging at buffered write time
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:34:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x494nst7z3v.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120408010600.GA31377@localhost> (Wu Fengguang's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:06:00 +0800")

Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> writes:

> Buffered write(2) is not directly tied to IO, so it's not suitable to
> handle plug in generic_file_aio_write().
[snip, moved]
> Note that plugging for O_SYNC writes is also removed. The user may pass
> arbitrary @size arguments, which may be much larger than the preferable
> I/O size, or may cross extent/device boundaries. Let the lower layers
> handle the plugging. Otherwise the plugging code here will turn the
> low level plugging into no-ops.

I assume you have some numbers to back this up, right?  Care to share
those?

> Also moves unplugging for direct I/O from around ->direct_IO() down to
> do_blockdev_direct_IO().

This could be handled in a separate patch.  Acked-by: Jeff Moyer
<jmoyer@redhat.com> for this part.

Cheers,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-09 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-08  1:06 [RESEND][PATCH v2] block: remove plugging at buffered write time Wu Fengguang
2012-04-09 14:34 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2012-04-11 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-12  1:32     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-12  2:20       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-12 14:26         ` Jan Kara
2012-04-13  1:40           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  3:43             ` [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty threshold Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  3:53               ` [PATCH] writeback: initialize global_dirty_limit Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03  9:25               ` [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty threshold Jan Kara
2012-05-03 10:02                 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-05-03 12:31                 ` Chris Mason
2012-05-03 13:30                 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-03 14:08               ` Fengguang Wu
2012-05-06  6:01           ` [RESEND][PATCH v2] block: remove plugging at buffered write time Fengguang Wu
2012-05-06  9:58       ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x494nst7z3v.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fusionio.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).