linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fs: aio fix rcu lookup
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:52:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x494o9bbkqo.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMwZnm3UKvmrPscBeZF77vh1sW0ERO1tuv1oNW@mail.gmail.com> (Nick Piggin's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:35:32 +1100")

Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> While hunting down a bug in NFS's AIO, I believe I found this
> buggy code...
>
> fs: aio fix rcu ioctx lookup
>
> aio-dio-invalidate-failure GPFs in aio_put_req from io_submit.
>
> lookup_ioctx doesn't implement the rcu lookup pattern properly.
> rcu_read_lock does not prevent refcount going to zero, so we
> might take a refcount on a zero count ioctx.

So, does this patch fix the problem?  You didn't actually say....

> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/aio.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/aio.c	2011-01-14 00:29:00.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/aio.c	2011-01-14 11:31:47.000000000 +1100
> @@ -239,15 +239,23 @@ static void __put_ioctx(struct kioctx *c
>  	call_rcu(&ctx->rcu_head, ctx_rcu_free);
>  }
>  
> -#define get_ioctx(kioctx) do {						\
> -	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(kioctx)->users) <= 0);			\
> -	atomic_inc(&(kioctx)->users);					\
> -} while (0)
> -#define put_ioctx(kioctx) do {						\
> -	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(kioctx)->users) <= 0);			\
> -	if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&(kioctx)->users))) 		\
> -		__put_ioctx(kioctx);					\
> -} while (0)
> +static inline void get_ioctx(struct kioctx *kioctx)
> +{
> +	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&kioctx->users) <= 0);
> +	atomic_inc(&kioctx->users);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int try_get_ioctx(struct kioctx *kioctx)
> +{
> +	return atomic_inc_not_zero(&kioctx->users);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void put_ioctx(struct kioctx *kioctx)
> +{
> +	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&kioctx->users) <= 0);
> +	if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&kioctx->users)))
> +		__put_ioctx(kioctx);
> +}

Why did you switch from macros?  Personal preference?  Can you at least
mention it in the changelog?

>  
>  /* ioctx_alloc
>   *	Allocates and initializes an ioctx.  Returns an ERR_PTR if it failed.
> @@ -601,8 +609,7 @@ static struct kioctx *lookup_ioctx(unsig
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(ctx, n, &mm->ioctx_list, list) {
> -		if (ctx->user_id == ctx_id && !ctx->dead) {
> -			get_ioctx(ctx);
> +		if (ctx->user_id == ctx_id && !ctx->dead && try_get_ioctx(ctx)){
>  			ret = ctx;
>  			break;
>  		}

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-14 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-14  1:35 [patch] fs: aio fix rcu lookup Nick Piggin
2011-01-14 14:52 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2011-01-14 15:00   ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-17 19:07     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-17 23:24       ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 17:21         ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-18 19:01         ` Jan Kara
2011-01-18 22:17           ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 23:00             ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-18 23:05               ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 23:52             ` Jan Kara
2011-01-19  0:20               ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 13:21                 ` Jan Kara
2011-01-19 16:03                   ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 16:50                     ` Jan Kara
2011-01-19 17:37                       ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-20 20:21                         ` Jan Kara
2011-01-19 19:13                   ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-19 19:46                     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-19 20:18                       ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 20:32                         ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-19 20:45                           ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 21:03                             ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-19 21:20                               ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-20  4:03                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-01-20 18:31                                   ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-20 20:02                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-01-20 20:15                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-21 21:22                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-01-20 20:16                                     ` Jan Kara
2011-01-20 21:16                                       ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-01 16:24                                       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x494o9bbkqo.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).