From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/direct-io.c: don't try to allocate more than BIO_MAX_PAGES in a bio
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:44:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x498vynbl4e.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294977946.21790.20.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> (David Dillow's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:05:46 -0500")
David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov> writes:
> When using devices that support max_segments > BIO_MAX_PAGES (256),
> direct IO tries to allocate a bio with more pages than allowed, which
> leads to an oops in dio_bio_alloc(). Clamp that request to the supported
> maximum.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
> --
> dio_bio_alloc() doesn't check the result of bio_alloc(), so it
> dereferences a NULL pointer. bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, ...) doesn't fail
> unless it gets called for an invalid number of pages, so it seems a bit
> like overkill to check for failure in dio_bio_alloc(), though it would
> have saved me some time tracking this down.
We should always be checking return values. Mind respinning the patch
to include that?
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 85882f6..9eb0553 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ static int dio_new_bio(struct dio *dio, sector_t start_sector)
> goto out;
> sector = start_sector << (dio->blkbits - 9);
> nr_pages = min(dio->pages_in_io, bio_get_nr_vecs(dio->map_bh.b_bdev));
> + nr_pages = min(nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
This looks fine. Thanks for tracking it down!
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-14 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-14 4:05 fs/direct-io.c: don't try to allocate more than BIO_MAX_PAGES in a bio David Dillow
2011-01-14 14:44 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2011-01-14 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 alt 1] " David Dillow
2011-01-14 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 alt 2] " David Dillow
2011-01-17 18:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-01-18 3:00 ` [PATCH v3] " David Dillow
2011-01-19 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-19 2:34 ` David Dillow
2011-01-19 15:53 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x498vynbl4e.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).