From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Venkataramanan\,
Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs/aio: Replace kmap{,_atomic}() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:41:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49h6zzvn1a.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221016150656.5803-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> (Fabio M. De Francesco's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:06:56 +0200")
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> writes:
> The use of kmap() and kmap_atomic() are being deprecated in favor of
> kmap_local_page().
>
> There are two main problems with kmap(): (1) It comes with an overhead as
> the mapping space is restricted and protected by a global lock for
> synchronization and (2) it also requires global TLB invalidation when the
> kmap’s pool wraps and it might block when the mapping space is fully
> utilized until a slot becomes available.
>
> With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
> page faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
> It is faster than kmap() in kernels with HIGHMEM enabled. Furthermore,
> the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run again, the
> kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
>
> Since its use in fs/aio.c is safe everywhere, it should be preferred.
That sentence is very ambiguous. I don't know what "its" refers to, and
I'm not sure what "safe" means in this context.
The patch looks okay to me.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-16 15:06 [RESEND PATCH] fs/aio: Replace kmap{,_atomic}() with kmap_local_page() Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-19 15:41 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2022-10-19 18:52 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-19 19:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2022-11-26 16:51 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-12-01 14:29 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-09 18:12 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-19 9:41 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49h6zzvn1a.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).