From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout()
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:15:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49lj0uj4rk.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103041552020.5003@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com> (Lukas Czerner's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:04:16 +0100 (CET)")
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> It seems to me like it might be better to just not complete anything
>> until the count is zero. Why issue a wakeup for every bio?
>> fs/direct-io does something similar, maybe take a look at the
>> dio_bio_end* routines and see if that would fit well here. With your
>> scheme, I worry about missing a completion, maybe because the first bio
>> completes before you are done submitting bios. Is that possible?
>
> I do not think it is possible. For every bio submitted there is
> wait_for_completion called. When bio complete()s completion->done is
> incremented (under the wait->lock). In wait_for_completion() we are
> waiting for single submitted bio to complete (completion->done > 0),
> then completion->done is decremented. It seems like simple
> synchronization.
>
> I am not sure what wakeup you have in mind, but thanks for the tip I'll
> look in fs/direct-io.
Let's say you have several bios to submit, and the first bio is errored
immediately in submit_bio. Since you didn't add yourself to the
waitqueue yet, you might miss the wakeup and sleep forever.
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 9:46 [PATCH] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout() Lukas Czerner
2011-03-04 14:15 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-04 15:04 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-04 15:15 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2011-03-07 12:25 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-07 14:38 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49lj0uj4rk.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).