From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: use cpu_online() to check p->sq_thread_cpu instead of cpu_possible()
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 07:22:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49mujypkzt.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507080319.2045-1-shhuiw@foxmail.com> (Shenghui Wang's message of "Tue, 7 May 2019 16:03:19 +0800")
Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com> writes:
> This issue is found by running liburing/test/io_uring_setup test.
>
> When test run, the testcase "attempt to bind to invalid cpu" would not
> pass with messages like:
> io_uring_setup(1, 0xbfc2f7c8), \
> flags: IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL|IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF, \
> resv: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000, \
> sq_thread_cpu: 2
> expected -1, got 3
> FAIL
>
> On my system, there is:
> CPU(s) possible : 0-3
> CPU(s) online : 0-1
> CPU(s) offline : 2-3
> CPU(s) present : 0-1
>
> The sq_thread_cpu 2 is offline on my system, so the bind should fail.
> But cpu_possible() will pass the check. We shouldn't be able to bind
> to an offline cpu. Use cpu_online() to do the check.
>
> After the change, the testcase run as expected: EINVAL will be returned
> for cpu offlined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index d91cbd53d3ca..718d7b873f4a 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2472,7 +2472,7 @@ static int io_sq_offload_start(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> nr_cpu_ids);
>
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> goto err;
>
> ctx->sqo_thread = kthread_create_on_cpu(io_sq_thread,
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 8:03 [PATCH] io_uring: use cpu_online() to check p->sq_thread_cpu instead of cpu_possible() Shenghui Wang
2019-05-07 11:22 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-07 8:00 Shenghui Wang
2019-05-07 14:40 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 7:24 Shenghui Wang
2019-05-01 11:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-05-01 14:15 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 14:32 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-05-01 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 15:40 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49mujypkzt.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shhuiw@foxmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).