From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubifs: Allow O_DIRECT Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:18:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1440016553-26481-2-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <55D542C5.6040500@cn.fujitsu.com> <1440070300.31419.202.camel@gmail.com> <55D5BC92.8050903@nod.at> <20150820204933.GG74600@google.com> <1440400405.15510.29.camel@gmail.com> <20150824161837.GA28975@localhost> <20150824234611.GV3902@dastard> <20150825141348.GF7176@ret.masoncoding.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Dave Chinner , Brian Norris , Artem Bityutskiy , Richard Weinberger , Dongsheng Yang , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150825141348.GF7176@ret.masoncoding.com> (Chris Mason's message of "Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:13:48 -0400") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Chris Mason writes: >> I do think we should at least document what file systems appear to be >> doing. Here's a man page patch for open (generated with extra context >> for easier reading). Let me know what you think. > > We shouldn't be ignoring it, but instead call it similar to O_DSYNC plus > removing the pages from cache. Ah, right. I'll fix that up, thanks. -Jeff