From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
jaxboe@fusionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blkdev: Submit discard bio in batches in blkdev_issue_discard()
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:29:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49sjt2ld1i.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1104281007530.31735@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com> (Lukas Czerner's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:09:18 +0200 (CEST)")
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>
>> > Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > Currently we are waiting for every submitted REQ_DISCARD bio separately,
>> > > but it can have unwanted consequences of repeatedly flushing the queue,
>> > > so we rather submit bios in batches and wait for the entire batch, hence
>> > > narrowing the window of other ios going in.
>> > >
>> > > Use bio_batch_end_io() and struct bio_batch for that purpose, the same
>> > > is used by blkdev_issue_zeroout(). Also change bio_batch_end_io() so we
>> > > always set !BIO_UPTODATE in the case of error and remove the check for
>> > > bb, since we are the only user of this function and we always set this.
>> > >
>> > > Remove bio_get()/bio_put() from the blkdev_issue_discard() since
>> > > bio_alloc() and bio_batch_end_io() is doing the same thing, hence it is
>> > > not needed anymore.
>> > >
>> > > I have done simple dd testing with surprising results. The script I have
>> > > used is:
>> > >
>> > > for i in $(seq 10); do
>> > > echo $i
>> > > dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=/dev/sdc1 bs=4k &
>> > > sleep 5
>> > > done
>> > > /usr/bin/time -f %e ./blkdiscard /dev/sdc1
>> > >
>> > > Running time of BLKDISCARD on the whole device:
>> > > with patch without patch
>> > > 0.95 15.58
>> > >
>> > > So we can see that in this artificial test the kernel with the patch
>> > > applied is approx 16x faster in discarding the device.
>> >
>> > I don't see any major problems here. I would like you to test
>> > explicitly for queue_flag_discard before submitting any bios, though.
>
> Btw, this is already in there:
>
> if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> at the top of the function.
Boy, how did I miss that? ;-)
Cheers,
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 12:39 [PATCH 1/2] blkdev: Submit discard bio in batches in blkdev_issue_discard() Lukas Czerner
2011-04-20 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] blkdev: Simple cleanup in blkdev_issue_zeroout() Lukas Czerner
2011-04-27 14:05 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-04-27 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] blkdev: Submit discard bio in batches in blkdev_issue_discard() Jeff Moyer
2011-04-28 7:57 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-04-28 8:09 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-04-28 13:29 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49sjt2ld1i.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).