From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:21:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1356573611-18590-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1356573611-18590-26-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20130208144408.GY2875@htj.dyndns.org> <20130208144902.GQ15092@kernel.dk> <20130208212706.GH27179@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, zab@redhat.com, bcrl@kvack.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, Andrew Morton To: Kent Overstreet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130208212706.GH27179@google.com> (Kent Overstreet's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:27:06 -0800") Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Kent Overstreet writes: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: [...] >> I'd feel a lot better deferring the whole aio/dio performance series for >> one merge window. There's very little point in rushing it, and I don't >> think it's been reviewed/tested enough yet. > > It could probably use more review, but it has been sitting in linux-next > and the issues that showed up there are all fixed. You going to help > review it? :) > > I'm not really set on it going in this merge cycle, but testing wise I > do think it's in pretty good shape and I'm not sure where we're going to > get more testing from before it goes in. > > And Andrew - apologies for not getting you the benchmarks you asked for, > getting hardware for it has turned out to be more troublesome than I > expected. Still don't know what's going on with that. I'll try to get some benchmarking numbers for this patch set. -Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org