From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:49:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49tyly8zpc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284060970-26829-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:36:10 +0200")
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> OCFS2 can return ERESTARTSYS from its write function when the process is
> signalled while waiting for a cluster lock (and the filesystem is mounted with
> intr mount option). Generally, it seems reasonable to allow filesystems to
> return this error code from its IO functions. As we must not leak ERESTARTSYS
> (and similar error codes) to userspace as a result of an AIO operation, we
> have to properly convert it to EINTR inside AIO code (restarting the syscall
> isn't really an option because other AIO could have been already submitted by
> the same io_submit syscall).
I had responded to your last posting with:
This is a confusing problem description. First, I'm assuming you
actually experienced this, is that right? Care to share the details of
that?
The above paragraph I think you addressed. I'm still curious about
this, though. The submission path should be as non-blocking as
possible. I guess you can't really get around locking, though. Was the
problem witnessed when doing O_DIRECT or buffered AIO?
Next, assuming we can get ERSTARTSYS and friends, it will be the return
code of a single iocb (reaped via io_getevents), not the return code of
the io_submit system call. I'm not saying this is right, I'm just
saying that your description of the problem is misleading.
That objection stands, but just warrants correcting the problem description.
Anyway, the code itself looks fine. ;-)
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-09 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 19:36 [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2) Jan Kara
2010-09-09 19:49 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2010-09-09 21:53 ` Jan Kara
2010-09-10 15:13 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49tyly8zpc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).