From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:50:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49y5qii1mx.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120329225743.GC18323@dastard> (Dave Chinner's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:57:43 +1100")
Hi, Dave,
Thanks for the review!
> or better still, factor xfs_file_fsync() so that it calls a helper
> that doesn't wait for data IO completion, and call that helper here
> too. The semantics of fsync/fdatasync are too complex to have to
> implement and maintain in multiple locations....
I definitely agree with consolidating things. However, there are four
blocking calls in xfs_file_fsync (filemap_write_and_wait_range,
xfs_blkdev_issue_flush, _xfs_log_force_lsn, and another call to
xfs_blkdev_issue_flush). How would you propose to make that
non-blocking given that those steps have to happen in sequence?
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-30 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 22:04 [PATCH 0/7, v3] fs: fix up AIO+DIO+O_SYNC to actually do the sync part Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] ocfs2: Use generic handlers of O_SYNC AIO DIO Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] gfs2: " Jeff Moyer
2012-04-02 14:29 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: " Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 14:50 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2012-03-30 19:45 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-04-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-03-30 18:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] ext4: " Jeff Moyer
2012-03-29 22:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] filemap: don't call generic_write_sync for -EIOCBQUEUED Jeff Moyer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-02 19:56 [PATCH 0/7, v2] fs: fix up AIO+DIO+O_SYNC to actually do the sync part Jeff Moyer
2012-03-02 19:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49y5qii1mx.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).