From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] a few storage topics Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:11:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4F1758D4.9010401@panasas.com> <20120119094637.GA23442@quack.suse.cz> <4F1BFF5F.6000502@panasas.com> <20120123161857.GC28526@quack.suse.cz> <20120123175353.GD30782@redhat.com> <20120124151504.GQ4387@shiny> <20120124165631.GA8941@infradead.org> <186EA560-1720-4975-AC2F-8C72C4A777A9@dilger.ca> <20120124184054.GA23227@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , Chris Mason , Andrea Arcangeli , Jan Kara , Boaz Harrosh , Mike Snitzer , "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" , "neilb\@suse.de" , "dm-devel\@redhat.com" , "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , "lsf-pc\@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "Darrick J.Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120124184054.GA23227@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:40:54 -0500") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > All three filesystems use the generic mpages code for reads, so they > all get the same (bad) I/O patterns. Looks like we need to fix this up > ASAP. Actually, in discussing this with Vivek, he mentioned that read ahead might be involved. Sure enough, after bumping read_ahead_kb, 1MB I/Os are sent down to the storage (for xfs anyway). Cheers, Jeff