From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] blkdev: honor discard_granularity in blkdev_issue_discard() Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:07:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1304345841-20063-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <1304345841-20063-3-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Lukas Czerner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Monakhov , Jens Axboe To: Jeff Moyer Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:54989 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754250Ab1EBRHj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2011 13:07:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jeff Moyer's message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 12:10:41 -0400") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Moyer writes: Jeff> Hm, I wonder where it makes sense to document this. Maybe Jeff> Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt, but I admit I wouldn't have Jeff> looked there while reviewing this code. Maybe we could simply add a comment in the kerneldoc header for blkdev_issue_discard()? I tried to keep Documentation/ABI/ up to date for the topology stuff but it looks like the discard portions never got merged. Probably fell through the cracks. I'll dig up the patch. But as you say -- I'm sure nobody looks. My only motivation for keeping the sysfs ABI doc in sync is to avoid gregkh's wrath... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering