linux-gcc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz@anda.ru>
To: Lukasz Michal Rak <L.Rak@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:04:04 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040706010404.B17650@natasha.ward.six> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407051912010.9712@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>; from L.Rak@elka.pw.edu.pl on Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:19:06PM +0200

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:19:06PM +0200, Lukasz Michal Rak wrote:
> > >  The convention is that the D flag in IA32 is cleared. So if you call a
> > > subroutine you have to clear D flag before making call.
> >
> > Do you mean that 'I have to clear the D flag if I had set it somewhere
> > before?'  Else what is the sense of the convention?
> Yes. Other code may assume that D is cleared and for example after calling
> your code will not check state of D flag, so if you will left D flag set
> this may cause errors.
> 
> > > The subroutine can change the state of D flag, but before returning
> > > the routine has to clear the D flag.
> >
> > If the subroutine can change the flag, that it will violate the
> > convention, won't it?  And what is the strength of the convention,
> > again?
> >
> Subroutine can change the D flag, but before exiting must clear it.
> 
> The convention should make you free from checking the state of flag
> and clearing at the beginning of your code.
> 
> > >  Hope I helped.
> >
> > Thanks, but I still don't understand something.  Again: if every
> > procedure keeps the flag clear at exit, then why the same every
> > procedure clears it at entry?  In a suspicion, that caller has changed
> > the flag against the rules?
> Just to be sure that the D flag is cleared. The convetion is one thing and
> reality other.

Ok.  Thanks!  It's the thing that I didn't understand.  BTW, where is
this convention documented, if either?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-05 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-04 15:37 x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program? Denis Zaitsev
2004-07-05 13:23 ` Lukasz Michal Rak
2004-07-05 16:26   ` Denis Zaitsev
2004-07-05 17:19     ` Lukasz Michal Rak
2004-07-05 19:04       ` Denis Zaitsev [this message]
2004-07-06 14:05         ` Lukasz Michal Rak
2004-07-07  0:32         ` Jim Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040706010404.B17650@natasha.ward.six \
    --to=zzz@anda.ru \
    --cc=L.Rak@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).