From: Keith Whyte <keith@media-solutions.ie>
To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 fork & defunct child.
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:26:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB96718.20103@media-solutions.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de>
Edgar Toernig wrote:
{ strace listing deleted, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106905386725308&w=2 }
>That is not normal /bin/true behaviour. Sure your system
>isn't hacked? Give the -f option to ptrace to see what the
>forked process is trying to do... Compare the size of
>/bin/true with a known-good one.
>
>Ciao, ET.
>
I'm not sure. I should be running tripwire or something, this is the
only one of my systems that doesn't run such a thing, as i have the
firewall locked down and have been busy.
But it is true i accidently did iptables -F and it was left that way for
a few days.
But this happens with any program, not just /bin/true, also the
/bin/true on the root and chroot systems are identical. and with much
interest i discovered, that if i unmount /proc, the problem goes away. aggh.
that is why it is not exhibiting itself in the chroot system, - no /proc.
I also remember that when this first happen nearly a year ago, some
"unix engineer" at the ISP said, oh yeah that's because something in the
ext2 filesystem header is corrupted.. i don't quite remember what he
said exactly, something that sounded so far fetched that i ignored it.
does that ring any bells with anyone?
please help, ug, i hate having a linux system that's not reliable. feels
like having a pet that's in pain or something.
btw,
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so
Keith
(i'm cross-posting here to gcc and admin in the hopes of finding someone
who has seen this, thanks!)
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1069053524.3fb87654286b5@ssl.buz.org>
[not found] ` <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de>
2003-11-18 0:26 ` Keith Whyte [this message]
2003-11-18 1:00 ` 2.4.18 fork & defunct child Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-11-20 2:42 ` solution: " Keith Whyte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB96718.20103@media-solutions.ie \
--to=keith@media-solutions.ie \
--cc=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).