From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36302C7EE24
	for <linux-gpio@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  6 Jun 2023 01:59:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S230472AbjFFB74 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-gpio@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Jun 2023 21:59:56 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41020 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229544AbjFFB7z (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 21:59:55 -0400
Received: from smtpbgau1.qq.com (smtpbgau1.qq.com [54.206.16.166])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D576B10D;
        Mon,  5 Jun 2023 18:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: Yeas47t1686016735t022t10825
Received: from 3DB253DBDE8942B29385B9DFB0B7E889 (jiawenwu@trustnetic.com [122.235.137.64])
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000000000F0FPF000000000000
From:   =?utf-8?b?Smlhd2VuIFd1?= <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
X-BIZMAIL-ID: 9184358918971991978
To:     "'Wolfram Sang'" <wsa@kernel.org>,
        "'Russell King \(Oracle\)'" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, <jsd@semihalf.com>,
        <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>, <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>,
        "'Piotr Raczynski'" <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
References: <20230605025211.743823-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <20230605025211.743823-3-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <ZH2IaM86ei2gQkfA@shikoro> <00c901d9977e$af0dc910$0d295b30$@trustnetic.com> <ZH2UT55SRNwN15t7@shikoro> <00eb01d99785$8059beb0$810d3c10$@trustnetic.com> <ZH2zb7smT/HbFx9k@shikoro> <ZH22jS7KPPBEVS2a@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <ZH3bwBZvjyIoFaVv@shikoro>
In-Reply-To: <ZH3bwBZvjyIoFaVv@shikoro>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v11 2/9] i2c: designware: Add driver support for Wangxun 10Gb NIC
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:58:54 +0800
Message-ID: <018701d9981a$7278a0a0$5769e1e0$@trustnetic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: zh-cn
Thread-Index: AQKoIYpMsU3pQxi84WWC4YPAy6bqVAIyHk5AAe8WB/YDFYJsZwGgoPRlARtMc6UB69Ld1gHEZZjMAfxOIvGtYvdiEA==
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: Yeas:trustnetic.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org

On Monday, June 5, 2023 8:58 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Be careful... net-next uses patchwork, and I suspect as this is posted
> > as a series which the subject line states as being destined by the
> > author for the "net-next" tree, the entire series will end up being
> > slurped into the net-next tree.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer. Jiawen Wu, would you kindly send a v12 of the
> series (without the I2C patch)?

Okay, v12 series will be other 8 patches for net-next.
Do I need to send this independent patch to I2C tree?