From: "Jan Kundrát" <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Add missing open drain/source handling to gpiod_set_value_cansleep()
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02320234-166e-42a2-b076-2c08284d3c99@cesnet.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515521301-4375-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On úterý 9. ledna 2018 19:08:21 CET, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Since commit f11a04464ae57e8d ("i2c: gpio: Enable working over slow
> can_sleep GPIOs"), probing the i2c RTC connected to an i2c-gpio bus on
> r8a7740/armadillo fails with:
>
> rtc-s35390a 0-0030: error resetting chip
> rtc-s35390a: probe of 0-0030 failed with error -5
>
> More debug code reveals:
>
> i2c i2c-0: master_xfer[0] R, addr=0x30, len=1
> i2c i2c-0: NAK from device addr 0x30 msg #0
> s35390a_get_reg: ret = -6
>
> Commit 02e479808b5d62f8 ("gpio: Alter semantics of *raw* operations to
> actually be raw") moved open drain/source handling from
> gpiod_set_raw_value_commit() to gpiod_set_value(), but forgot to take
> into account that gpiod_set_value_cansleep() also needs this handling.
> The i2c protocol mandates that i2c signals are open drain, hence i2c
> communication fails.
>
> Fix this by adding the missing handling to gpiod_set_value_cansleep(),
> using a new common helper __gpiod_set_value_nocheck().
>
> Fixes: 02e479808b5d62f8 ("gpio: Alter semantics of *raw*
> operations to actually be raw")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> The bad gpio commit is in v4.15-rc1 and later.
> The i2c commit exposing this is not yet upstream, but in i2c/for-next.
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 358bce6e798b476c..7761d632a5b0dd20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2927,6 +2927,18 @@ void gpiod_set_raw_value(struct
> gpio_desc *desc, int value)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_raw_value);
>
> +static void __gpiod_set_value_nocheck(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
> +{
> + if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
> + value = !value;
> + if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags))
> + gpio_set_open_drain_value_commit(desc, value);
> + else if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags))
> + gpio_set_open_source_value_commit(desc, value);
> + else
> + gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(desc, value);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * gpiod_set_value() - assign a gpio's value
> * @desc: gpio whose value will be assigned
> @@ -2941,16 +2953,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_raw_value);
> void gpiod_set_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
> {
> VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
> - /* Should be using gpiod_set_value_cansleep() */
> WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
> - if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
> - value = !value;
> - if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags))
> - gpio_set_open_drain_value_commit(desc, value);
> - else if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags))
> - gpio_set_open_source_value_commit(desc, value);
> - else
> - gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(desc, value);
> + __gpiod_set_value_nocheck(desc, value);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_value);
>
> @@ -3277,9 +3281,7 @@ void gpiod_set_value_cansleep(struct
> gpio_desc *desc, int value)
> {
> might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
> VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
> - if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
> - value = !value;
> - gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(desc, value);
> + __gpiod_set_value_nocheck(desc, value);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_value_cansleep);
>
I realize that I'm late to the party (a merge request has been sent), but I
can confirm that I tested that this still works for a bitbang I2C over GPIO
pins connected to MAX14830 managed by max310x.
Tested-By: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Cheers,
Jan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 18:08 [PATCH] gpio: Add missing open drain/source handling to gpiod_set_value_cansleep() Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-10 13:17 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-10 13:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-11 10:29 ` Jan Kundrát [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02320234-166e-42a2-b076-2c08284d3c99@cesnet.cz \
--to=jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).