From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] gpio: improve support for shared GPIOs
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 14:31:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b402bba-0399-4f93-873e-890a78570ff7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924-gpio-shared-v1-0-775e7efeb1a3@linaro.org>
On 9/24/25 3:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Here's a functional RFC for improving the handling of shared GPIOs in
> linux.
>
> Problem statement: GPIOs are implemented as a strictly exclusive
> resource in the kernel but there are lots of platforms on which single
> pin is shared by multiple devices which don't communicate so need some
> way of properly sharing access to a GPIO. What we have now is the
> GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag which was introduced as a hack and
> doesn't do any locking or arbitration of access - it literally just hand
> the same GPIO descriptor to all interested users.
Isn't the main issue here is about not using a correct framework around
to the gpios that driver uses. ex: the codec usecase that you are
refering in this is using gpio to reset the line, instead of using a
proper gpio-reset control. same with some of the gpio-muxes. the problem
is fixed once such direct users of gpio are move their correct frameworks.
Am not sure adding a abstraction with-in gpio framework is right
solution, But I do agree that NONEXCLUSIVE flags should disappear and
users that are using this should be moved to correct frameworks where
they belong.
--srini
>
> The proposed solution is composed of three major parts: the high-level,
> shared GPIO proxy driver that arbitrates access to the shared pin and
> exposes a regular GPIO chip interface to consumers, a low-level shared
> GPIOLIB module that scans firmware nodes and creates auxiliary devices
> that attach to the proxy driver and finally a set of core GPIOLIB
> changes that plug the former into the GPIO lookup path.
>
> The changes are implemented in a way that allows to seamlessly compile
> out any code related to sharing GPIOs for systems that don't need it.
>
> The practical use-case for this are the powerdown GPIOs shared by
> speakers on Qualcomm db845c platform, however I have also extensively
> tested it using gpio-virtuser on arm64 qemu with various DT
> configurations.
>
> I'm Cc'ing some people that may help with reviewing/be interested in
> this: OF maintainers (because the main target are OF systems initially),
> Mark Brown because most users of GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE live
> in audio or regulator drivers and one of the goals of this series is
> dropping the hand-crafted GPIO enable counting via struct
> regulator_enable_gpio in regulator core), Andy and Mika because I'd like
> to also cover ACPI (even though I don't know about any ACPI platform that
> would need this at the moment, I think it makes sense to make the
> solution complete), Dmitry (same thing but for software nodes), Mani
> (because you have a somewhat related use-case for the PERST# signal and
> I'd like to hear your input on whether this is something you can use or
> maybe it needs a separate, implicit gpio-perst driver similar to what
> Krzysztof did for reset-gpios) and Greg (because I mentioned this to you
> last week in person and I also use the auxiliary bus for the proxy
> devices).
>
> First patch in the series is a bugfix targetting stable, I'm surprised
> nobody noticed the lockdep splat yet. The second adds a library function
> I use in a later patch. All remaining patches implement or use the
> shared GPIO support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
> Bartosz Golaszewski (9):
> gpio: wcd934x: mark the GPIO controller as sleeping
> string: provide strends()
> gpiolib: define GPIOD_FLAG_SHARED
> gpiolib: implement low-level, shared GPIO support
> gpio: shared-proxy: implement the shared GPIO proxy driver
> gpiolib: support shared GPIOs in core subsystem code
> arm64: select HAVE_SHARED_GPIOS for ARCH_QCOM
> ASoC: wsa881x: drop GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag from GPIO lookup
> ASoC: wsa883x: drop GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag from GPIO lookup
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 17 ++
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c | 328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpio/gpio-wcd934x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c | 481 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h | 71 ++++++
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 50 +++-
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 1 +
> include/linux/string.h | 2 +
> lib/string.c | 19 ++
> lib/tests/string_kunit.c | 13 ++
> sound/soc/codecs/wsa881x.c | 3 +-
> sound/soc/codecs/wsa883x.c | 7 +-
> 14 files changed, 980 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: b46f7370d4a0f0b55f05b854e73b2a90dff41e1b
> change-id: 20250908-gpio-shared-67ec352884b6
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-04 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 14:51 [PATCH RFC 0/9] gpio: improve support for shared GPIOs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] gpio: wcd934x: mark the GPIO controller as sleeping Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] string: provide strends() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] gpiolib: define GPIOD_FLAG_SHARED Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] gpiolib: implement low-level, shared GPIO support Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] gpio: shared-proxy: implement the shared GPIO proxy driver Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] gpiolib: support shared GPIOs in core subsystem code Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] arm64: select HAVE_SHARED_GPIOS for ARCH_QCOM Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] ASoC: wsa881x: drop GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag from GPIO lookup Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] ASoC: wsa883x: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-24 18:25 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] gpio: improve support for shared GPIOs Dmitry Torokhov
2025-09-24 18:58 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-06 15:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-06 16:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-06 21:52 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-10-06 22:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-07 12:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 1:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-21 12:06 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 12:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-21 12:22 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 12:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-21 14:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 15:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-01 8:49 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-01 10:53 ` Linus Walleij
2025-10-01 13:04 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-04 13:31 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2025-10-06 11:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-06 21:55 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-10-07 13:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-07 13:18 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-07 13:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-06 12:19 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-07 12:32 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-10-09 10:12 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-17 17:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-17 17:32 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-20 9:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-21 14:42 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-21 15:02 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b402bba-0399-4f93-873e-890a78570ff7@kernel.org \
--to=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).