linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gpio: samsung: Remove double variable assignment
@ 2014-02-15 13:29 Alexander Shiyan
  2014-02-24 14:22 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Shiyan @ 2014-02-15 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio; +Cc: Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Alexander Shiyan

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index a85e00b..929f31e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static int s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
 		reg -= 4;
 		break;
 	case 6:
-		shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
 		reg -= 4;
 	default:
 		shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
-- 
1.8.3.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: Remove double variable assignment
  2014-02-15 13:29 [PATCH] gpio: samsung: Remove double variable assignment Alexander Shiyan
@ 2014-02-24 14:22 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-02-24 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Shiyan, Tomasz Figa, Sylwester Nawrocki, Kgene Kim,
	Heiko Stübner
  Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index a85e00b..929f31e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static int s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
>                 reg -= 4;
>                 break;
>         case 6:
> -               shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
>                 reg -= 4;
>         default:
>                 shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;

This makes perfect sense from a semantic point of view.

But I'm just worried that it may be a syntactic error after all,
such as a break; missing in case 6?

What does Samsung folks say about this?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-24 14:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-15 13:29 [PATCH] gpio: samsung: Remove double variable assignment Alexander Shiyan
2014-02-24 14:22 ` Linus Walleij

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).