linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gnurou@gmail.com, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: clamp returned values to the boolean range
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:40:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393378800-7220-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> (raw)

Nothing prevents GPIO drivers from returning values outside the
boolean range, and as it turns out a few drivers are actually doing so.
These values were passed as-is to unsuspecting consumers and created
confusion.

This patch makes the internal _gpiod_get_raw_value() function return a
bool, effectively clamping the GPIO value to the boolean range no
matter what the driver does.

While we are at it, we also change the value parameter of
_gpiod_set_raw_value() to bool type before drivers start doing funny
things with non-boolean values.

Another way to fix this would be to change the prototypes of the driver
interface to use bool directly, but this would require a huge
cross-systems patch so this simpler solution is preferred.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
---
This issue was discussed some time ago already
(https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org/msg02019.html),
here is finally the fix for it. Not exactly what we planned but who would
take a hundreds-lines change when a two-liner does the same?

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 50c4922fe53a..45cefccbf4bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_is_active_low);
  * that the GPIO was actually requested.
  */
 
-static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
+static bool _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
 	int value;
@@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@ static void _gpio_set_open_source_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
 			  __func__, err);
 }
 
-static void _gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
+static void _gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool value)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
 
-- 
1.9.0


             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-26  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  1:40 Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2014-03-05  1:49 ` [PATCH] gpio: clamp returned values to the boolean range Linus Walleij
2014-03-05  2:04   ` Joe Perches
2014-03-05  2:14     ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-03-05  2:19       ` Joe Perches
2014-03-05  2:22         ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-03-05  2:33           ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05  3:09             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1393378800-7220-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).