From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Hovold Subject: [PATCH 5/6] gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip_remove Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1421079149-2236-6-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org> References: <1421079149-2236-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1421079149-2236-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold , stable List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Move direct and indirect calls to gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges outside of spin lock as they can end up taking a mutex in pinctrl_remove_gpio_range. Note that the pin ranges are already added outside of the lock. Fixes: 9ef0d6f7628b ("gpiolib: call pin removal in chip removal function") Fixes: f23f1516b675 ("gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges") Cc: stable Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 0f8173051edc..37f919dc2cb4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -330,12 +330,10 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip) gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip); - - spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); - gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip); of_gpiochip_remove(chip); + spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) { if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) dev_crit(chip->dev, "REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED\n"); -- 2.0.5