From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: gpio: ARCH_MB86S7X? Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:21:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1422008501.30730.22.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:53652 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752782AbbAWKVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 05:21:44 -0500 Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Jassi Brar Cc: Valentin Rothberg , Andy Green , Vincent Yang , Tetsuya Nuriya , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jassi, Your commit 0da094d82c27 ("gpio: Add Fujitsu MB86S7x GPIO driver") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150123). I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem in it. That commit added the Kconfig symbol GPIO_MB86S7X and made it depend on ARCH_MB86S7X. But there's no Kconfig symbol ARCH_MB86S7X in linux-next. I assume a patch to add that symbol is queued somewhere. Is that correct? Please note that I actually managed to cross-compile drivers/gpio/gpio-mb86s7x.c with this command: make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnu- EXTRA_CFLAGS="-DCONFIG_GPIOLIB=y" drivers/gpio/gpio-mb86s7x.o So, for what it's worth, that dependency appears to be not needed to build this driver. Thanks, Paul Bolle