From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:28:53 +0300 Message-ID: <1444030133.8361.364.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1443698430-74415-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:41508 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751517AbbJEHbH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 03:31:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Lee Jones , Wolfram Sang , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , "Puustinen, Ismo" , "Pandruvada, Srinivas" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 09:20 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > The patches 7 and 8 are pretty independent, though they don't make > > much sense > > without previous ones applied. > > To me it seems patches 5 & 6 (GPIO patches) can be applied as-is > to my GPIO tree without any bad side effects. Is this correct? Yes, that's correct. > > In that case I will apply them. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy