From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yingjoe Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:56 +0800 Message-ID: <1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1450412497-25872-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+glpam-linux-mediatek=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Fabio Estevam , Maoguang Meng , Axel Lin , Hongzhou Yang , Patrice Chotard , open list , Fabian Frederick , "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , Matthias Brugger , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > > > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find > > their pctldev without probe deferring. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz > > I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this? > > Or should it be applied? We'll have another patch to change init orders for pwrap, mt6397 mfd core and mt6397 regulator. Before that, the mt6397 pinctrl changes in this patch won't work as expect. Apply this now won't cause any problem either, unless someone think we should stink to current orders. So I think we could apply this now: Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen Joe.C