From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Kim Tatt Chuah <kim.tatt.chuah@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Prevent force threading of the interrupt handler
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:25:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466065537-82027-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466065537-82027-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The pinctrl-intel needs to use request_irq() instead of chained interrupt
handling because it shares the interrupt with multiple GPIO host
controllers found on Intel CPUs. In -rt all such interrupts are forced to
run in thread context which triggers following warning:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 530 at kernel/irq/handle.c:151 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x23d/0x240
irq 348 handler irq_default_primary_handler+0x0/0x10 enabled interrupts
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 530 Comm: irq/14-INT3452: Not tainted 4.6.2-rt5 #1060
0000000000000000 ffff88007a257c98 ffffffff812d8494 ffff88007a257ce8
0000000000000000 ffff88007a257cd8 ffffffff8105e554 000000977a257d90
ffff88007a37a380 000000000000015c 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff812d8494>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x6b
[<ffffffff8105e554>] __warn+0xe4/0x100
[<ffffffff8105e5bf>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
[<ffffffff810b18f0>] ? __synchronize_hardirq+0x60/0x60
[<ffffffff810b17fd>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x23d/0x240
[<ffffffff810b1862>] handle_irq_event+0x62/0x90
[<ffffffff810b4e1f>] handle_edge_irq+0x8f/0x190
[<ffffffff810b0d82>] generic_handle_irq+0x22/0x30
[<ffffffff81307abc>] intel_gpio_irq+0xdc/0x150
[<ffffffff810b2293>] irq_forced_thread_fn+0x23/0x70
[<ffffffff810b250b>] irq_thread+0x13b/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8167b844>] ? __schedule+0x2e4/0x5a0
[<ffffffff810b2270>] ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.37+0xd0/0xd0
[<ffffffff810b25a0>] ? irq_thread+0x1d0/0x1d0
[<ffffffff810b23d0>] ? wake_threads_waitq+0x30/0x30
[<ffffffff8107e624>] kthread+0xd4/0xf0
[<ffffffff8167ec27>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x17/0x40
[<ffffffff8167f592>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
[<ffffffff8107e550>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190
The handle_irq_event_* functions (and I suppose generic_handle_irq()) is
expected to be called with interrupts disabled and they rightfully complain
here because we run in thread context with interrupts enabled.
Fix this by adding IRQF_NO_THREAD flag when the master interrupt is
requested. This prevents forced threading of the interrupt used by the GPIO
host controllers.
Reported-by: Kim Tatt Chuah <kim.tatt.chuah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi,
I'm not 100% sure this is the proper fix so adding tglx in case there is a
better alternative. It would be nice to be able to handle irqchip
interrupts from thread context.
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index f1b14f256001..fe19b1e7b278 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -919,7 +919,8 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
* to the irq directly) because on some platforms several GPIO
* controllers share the same interrupt line.
*/
- ret = devm_request_irq(pctrl->dev, irq, intel_gpio_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(pctrl->dev, irq, intel_gpio_irq,
+ IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
dev_name(pctrl->dev), pctrl);
if (ret) {
dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to request interrupt\n");
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 8:25 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: intel: Use raw_spinlock for locking Mika Westerberg
2016-06-16 8:25 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-06-18 8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Prevent force threading of the interrupt handler Linus Walleij
2016-06-18 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: intel: Use raw_spinlock for locking Linus Walleij
2016-06-18 8:36 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466065537-82027-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.tatt.chuah@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).