From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] gpio: merrifield: Introduce GPIO driver to support Merrifield Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:03:14 +0300 Message-ID: <1468231394.30123.537.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1468229245-131478-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:46357 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030560AbcGKKDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:03:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1468229245-131478-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Mika Westerberg , David Cohen On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:27 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Intel Merrifield platform has a special GPIO controller to drive pads > when they > are muxed in corresponding mode. > > Intel Merrifield GPIO IP is slightly different here and there in > comparison to > the older Intel MID platforms. These differences include in particular > the > shaked register offsets, specific support of level triggered > interrupts and > wake capable sources, as well as a pinctrl which is a separate IP. > > Instead of uglifying existing driver I decide to provide a new one > slightly > based on gpio-intel-mid.c. So, anyone can easily compare what changes > are > happened to be here. > Please, discard this since previous is already applied. Moreover this one has a typo, so, needs to be addressed anyway. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy